ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

application for leave to remain refused

Family member & Ancestry immigration; don't post other immigration categories, please!
Marriage | Unmarried Partners | Fiancé | Ancestry

Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator

Locked
olegunna
Newly Registered
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:42 am

application for leave to remain refused

Post by olegunna » Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:37 pm

i came to the UK on a working holidaymaker visa and later extended my stay on a leave to remain for 6months. Within that time i married a british citizen and applied for a leave to remain. About three months later i received a letter from the home office to the effect that my application is valid and that further investigation was being made.

six months later i received a letter from the home office inviting my spouse and i for an interview. we went and later received a letter from the home office refusing the application on the basis that there were some inconsistencies in our response during the interview.
further i was not given a right of appeal because according to them my visa had run out at the time of my application even though it had not and even though they had previously sent me a letter saying the application is valid. so if i had no leave to remain at the time of my application why would they then have said that my application was valid only to change their minds later when they refused the application.

i would be grateful for your advice on what to do next.
thanks.

Wanderer
Diamond Member
Posts: 10511
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 1:46 pm
Ireland

Re: application for leave to remain refused

Post by Wanderer » Fri Feb 06, 2009 1:43 pm

olegunna wrote:i came to the UK on a working holidaymaker visa and later extended my stay on a leave to remain for 6months. Within that time i married a british citizen and applied for a leave to remain. About three months later i received a letter from the home office to the effect that my application is valid and that further investigation was being made.

six months later i received a letter from the home office inviting my spouse and i for an interview. we went and later received a letter from the home office refusing the application on the basis that there were some inconsistencies in our response during the interview.
further i was not given a right of appeal because according to them my visa had run out at the time of my application even though it had not and even though they had previously sent me a letter saying the application is valid. so if i had no leave to remain at the time of my application why would they then have said that my application was valid only to change their minds later when they refused the application.

i would be grateful for your advice on what to do next.
thanks.
There's a similar post in this forum -basically u cant switch from WHM to a settlement-type visa in-country - sorry.
An chéad stad eile Stáisiún Uí Chonghaile....

Plum70
Diamond Member
Posts: 1363
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 12:07 pm

Post by Plum70 » Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:44 pm

Wonder why the UKBA didn't inform the applicant in the first place of their ineligibility to switch in-country instead of the merry-go-round approach?

olegunna
Newly Registered
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:42 am

Post by olegunna » Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:30 pm

Plum70 wrote:Wonder why the UKBA didn't inform the applicant in the first place of their ineligibility to switch in-country instead of the merry-go-round approach?
the question is not about eligibility or at least they are not saying so. they are saying they were inconsistencies in the response and that they don't believe that the marriage is subsisting. that is the central point. because i know a lot of people who have switched so it is not a concern. my point is the are not giving me the right of appeal because according to them at the time of application i didnt have right of appeal even though i have evidence to opposite and they themselves acknowledge that by writing to me initially to say that the application was valid.

User avatar
Casa
Moderator
Posts: 25817
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:32 pm
United Kingdom

Post by Casa » Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:43 pm

Switching from WHV to UPV was until recently allowed, but they are
now working strictly within the rules...and so no longer is an option.

olegunna
Newly Registered
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:42 am

Post by olegunna » Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:29 am

Casa wrote:Switching from WHV to UPV was until recently allowed, but they are
now working strictly within the rules...and so no longer is an option.
i applied over a year ago when it was still valid. the question is not about validity or otherwise so if someone has any information of the substantive matter please help because the UKBA are not even claiming that switching from whv to leave to remain is not possible. so that is not an issue.
thanks

bototo
Member
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by bototo » Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:58 am

They may argue that "application is valid" does not constitute a binding obligation.

It would revolve on the precise nature of "validity". An application for a job could be valid if you provide the CV, reference and everything they ask for. This does not mean that you are guaranteed the job. It may not even guarantee that they'll consider you for the job - they could have abruptly ceased recruiting.

I'm not trying to be nasty, I'm pointing out UKBA's possible response.

republique
BANNED
Posts: 1342
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:58 pm

Post by republique » Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:11 pm

olegunna wrote:
Plum70 wrote:Wonder why the UKBA didn't inform the applicant in the first place of their ineligibility to switch in-country instead of the merry-go-round approach?
the question is not about eligibility or at least they are not saying so. they are saying they were inconsistencies in the response and that they don't believe that the marriage is subsisting. that is the central point. because i know a lot of people who have switched so it is not a concern. my point is the are not giving me the right of appeal because according to them at the time of application i didnt have right of appeal even though i have evidence to opposite and they themselves acknowledge that by writing to me initially to say that the application was valid.
those are two different things, a valid application doesnt mean you have have the right to appeal
with this knowledge, prepare yourself to return home

PaperPusher
Respected Guru
Posts: 2038
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 5:47 pm
Location: London

Post by PaperPusher » Sun Feb 08, 2009 8:54 pm

olegunna

Do you have evidence of posting? Like a recorded/special delivery slip? They take the date of posting to be the date that the application is made when it comes to whether your application was made before your visa ran out, unless you did it in person.

Valid does not mean that they are saying you made it before your visa ran out.

olegunna
Newly Registered
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:42 am

Post by olegunna » Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:41 pm

PaperPusher wrote:olegunna

Do you have evidence of posting? Like a recorded/special delivery slip? They take the date of posting to be the date that the application is made when it comes to whether your application was made before your visa ran out, unless you did it in person.

Valid does not mean that they are saying you made it before your visa ran out.
yea i do have evidence that it was posted in time. any advice?

INSIDER
Member
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:13 am

Post by INSIDER » Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:07 pm

Just a little observation which I concede may not be entirely relevant.
But the poster did not switch from a WHV.By the time he made his application for leave to remain on the basis of his marriage he had already been granted leave to remain for 6 months on some other basis which remains unclear.

vinny
Moderator
Posts: 33343
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:58 pm

Post by vinny » Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:21 pm

olegunna wrote:i came to the UK on a working holidaymaker visa and later extended my stay on a leave to remain for 6months. Within that time i married a british citizen and applied for a leave to remain.
It's possible to switch to spouse status, subject to 284(i), etc.

If you posted your FLR(M) application in-time, then you should have the right of appeal (82(2)(d)) and may lodge an appeal within 10 business days.
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.
We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

Locked