- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Let us not wait until December. I think we should start sending our petitions and letter soon after July 19th, when they publish the details of the interim cap. Since they are going to cap the CoS applications for T2, we will get a better idea on how the T1 may be capped (if they intend to cap it)Saga wrote:Do we really know more details will come?Let us wait for a couple of weeks more until further details are published on how exactly they are going to implement the changes from July 19th to April 2010. We can then send the petition or letter accordingly.
Should we just wait till Dec? Or the best way would be try to have an affect on MAC (if we can).
I totally agree with you. We should be united at this very moment to make sure that our basic rights are protected!MJNair wrote:Let us not wait until December. I think we should start sending our petitions and letter soon after July 19th, when they publish the details of the interim cap. Since they are going to cap the CoS applications for T2, we will get a better idea on how the T1 may be capped (if they intend to cap it)Saga wrote:Do we really know more details will come?Let us wait for a couple of weeks more until further details are published on how exactly they are going to implement the changes from July 19th to April 2010. We can then send the petition or letter accordingly.
Should we just wait till Dec? Or the best way would be try to have an affect on MAC (if we can).
This will give us enough time to discuss with the HSMP forum and come up with a good letter and petition
Good point. The only reason why I moved here in the first place was that Tier 1 visa used to be much better than H1B in the US, in that it allowed employment of dependents, and put people on clear path to settlement, provided they complied with rules.GSOtodd wrote:I just have to ask this. Have any of you asked yourselves what is the point of staying in this country and going through all this when there are other countries in the EU and in other places where we could spend our time feeling welcome and working and living without uncertainity? I have gone to bed every night wondering, why bother if they don't want us here. I don't think the US has changed their immigration laws as much as we have changed ours in the past four years.
I'm sure our talents will be appreciated more in other areas. Life is to short to live in uncertainity when we don't have to.
This may be slightly off-topic, but having lived both in the US and in Europe for a number of years, I feel that if given a choice, I would move to the US, without giving a second thought.GSOtodd wrote:I came from the US. However, hopefully I'll be able to get ILR in January but still, no guarantees.
ukswus wrote:This may be slightly off-topic, but having lived both in the US and in Europe for a number of years, I feel that if given a choice, I would move to the US, without giving a second thought.GSOtodd wrote:I came from the US. However, hopefully I'll be able to get ILR in January but still, no guarantees.
The problem is, most people on this forum don't have such choices, and have to "take it, or leave it", when leaving is rarely a feasible option.
If only you could be 20 everyday...GSOtodd wrote:I just have to ask this. Have any of you asked yourselves what is the point of staying in this country and going through all this...
Same thoughts here.. We've put in a lot to get where we are..Pierrot95 wrote:If only you could be 20 everyday...GSOtodd wrote:I just have to ask this. Have any of you asked yourselves what is the point of staying in this country and going through all this...
It is not easy to start evrything from scratch. We invested our time, our skills and our expectation in this country. Is it that easy to move? Is there any office where I can make an appointment and get out with a package including a permanent job in my domain of expertise, a house with a good deal mortgage arranged, school for the kids with their many years friends, an acceptable job for the spouse and permanent residency cards (or green cards or any equivalent cards) for the whole family? I would leave next week.
====
If tier 1 (G) holders’ initial decisions were made based on the assumption that we are only going to be allowed to stay in the UK temporally, I believe that many of us will make different arrangement i.e choose not to come to the UK. However, it is not student visa or visitor visa that we applied, final settlement is part of the deal that encouraged majority of us come to this country and start a new life at the first place. We are not entitled to claim any benefit despite paying full tax and NI. UK have benefited from the skills and hard work that we have provided but now just want to kick us off the boat. I know life isn’t fair—but this is life changing time and just too important to just accept whatever given to us and give it up without a fight.layman wrote:My two pence. I understand it is a difficult situation to be in, with frequently changing immigration laws. But why is there an expectation that the UK immigration laws should take care of the immigrants problems arising out of the changing laws?
Immigration has been allowed only to benefit UK, basically to fill in the shortage of skilled resources and get the job done. The fact that we get to fulfill our aspirations is just a by-product for the UK government. The first and foremost priority would always be keeping the local population happy.
No, I am not saying that there should be no protest. But I would not pin my hopes on favourable immigration laws and make life's important decisions based on presumptions. Always have a back-up plan or atleast be mentally prepared for the worst.
We are all HSMPians ( before April'06) know the pain and stress when Home Office tried to put extra bar for extension and wanted to give us ILR after 5 years instead of 4 years. But history says, HSMPians went to court and forced them to bow down & keep their promise exactly what was given to us. BUT, the basic difference is that HSMPian ( now Tire-1) who came after Nov '06 had to sign as acknowledgement that immigration law in UK can be changed in future and it can affect them.Pierrot95 wrote:If only you could be 20 everyday...GSOtodd wrote:I just have to ask this. Have any of you asked yourselves what is the point of staying in this country and going through all this...
It is not easy to start evrything from scratch. We invested our time, our skills and our expectation in this country. Is it that easy to move? Is there any office where I can make an appointment and get out with a package including a permanent job in my domain of expertise, a house with a good deal mortgage arranged, school for the kids with their many years friends, an acceptable job for the spouse and permanent residency cards (or green cards or any equivalent cards) for the whole family? I would leave next week.
====
Life's important decisions are generally based on presumptions. Take marriage for example... another important decision in life... it is again based on the presumption that it will work.. we do not take a girlfriend/boyfriend as a backup thinking that the marriage may not work.and make life's important decisions based on presumptions. Always have a back-up plan or atleast be mentally prepared for the worst.
willnotbackHSMP wrote:We are all HSMPians ( before April'06) know the pain and stress when Home Office tried to put extra bar for extension and wanted to give us ILR after 5 years instead of 4 years. But history says, HSMPians went to court and forced them to bow down & keep their promise exactly what was given to us. The basic difference is that HSMPian ( now Tire-1) who came after Nov '06 had to sign as acknowledgement that immigration law in UK can be changed in future.Pierrot95 wrote:If only you could be 20 everyday...GSOtodd wrote:I just have to ask this. Have any of you asked yourselves what is the point of staying in this country and going through all this...
It is not easy to start evrything from scratch. We invested our time, our skills and our expectation in this country. Is it that easy to move? Is there any office where I can make an appointment and get out with a package including a permanent job in my domain of expertise, a house with a good deal mortgage arranged, school for the kids with their many years friends, an acceptable job for the spouse and permanent residency cards (or green cards or any equivalent cards) for the whole family? I would leave next week.
====
Does it mean that tier 1 who came after Nov 06 has little chance to win and make sure HO keep their promises this time?The basic difference is that HSMPian ( now Tire-1) who came after Nov '06 had to sign as acknowledgement that immigration law in UK can be changed in future.
I applied for HSMP in April 2007 (post Nov 2007)BUT, the basic difference is that HSMPian ( now Tire-1) who came after Nov '06 had to sign as acknowledgement that immigration law in UK can be changed in future and it can affect them.
willnotbackHSMP wrote:I'm not solicitor, so can't comment about the win. But you see , always there is humanitarian ground exists in all cases like article 9 of Europian Law ( or another name - I forgot )
You have remind me that history. I can say BOLDLY it is a GREAT history as this organization is the first one in UK history under which one immigration group stood together and brought the HO in to high court and win. At first time there two small groups called meeting ( each group had no connection with other ). One in Trafalgar Square and other was in Toyonby Hall in Aldgate in a same day coincidently! Some ppl came to Toyonby Hall after Trafalgar Square meeting also. There a strong committee was created and many sub commitees like finance, publication etc. At 1st place a strong demonstration held in front of Westminister to bring notice of important ppl like MP and others. Committee was able to bring BBC too to cover this event. Later a yahoo group was created for discussion among HSMPians. After that , a website was created too. In this many way HSMP group started its journey....rest you know well.ldbright wrote:willnotbackHSMP wrote:I'm not solicitor, so can't comment about the win. But you see , always there is humanitarian ground exists in all cases like article 9 of Europian Law ( or another name - I forgot )
Thank you for replying. I think what we need is a body like hsmp ltd that can united and lead tier1ians. At least by doing this, we can consult a solicitor to have some clarification on this. – How did you guys get things started last time?
I admire you guys' courage!willnotbackHSMP wrote:You have remind me that history. I can say BOLDLY it is a GREAT history as this organization is the first one in UK history under which one immigration group stood together and brought the HO in to high court and win. At first time there two small groups called meeting ( each group had no connection with other ). One in Trafalgar Square and other was in Toyonby Hall in Aldgate in a same day coincidently! Some ppl came to Toyonby Hall after Trafalgar Square meeting also. There a strong committee was created and many sub commitees like finance, publication etc. At 1st place a strong demonstration held in front of Westminister to bring notice of important ppl like MP and others. Committee was able to bring BBC too to cover this event. Later a yahoo group was created for discussion among HSMPians. After that , a website was created too. In this many way HSMP group started its journey....rest you know well.ldbright wrote:willnotbackHSMP wrote:I'm not solicitor, so can't comment about the win. But you see , always there is humanitarian ground exists in all cases like article 9 of Europian Law ( or another name - I forgot )
Thank you for replying. I think what we need is a body like hsmp ltd that can united and lead tier1ians. At least by doing this, we can consult a solicitor to have some clarification on this. – How did you guys get things started last time?
So far I can recall , the judgment focused on FAQ of guied line which was published along with HSMP application form. At some point of FAQ it was stated that nothing will affect the applicant in case of change of immigration law in UK in future. The FAQ started its answer in this wayMJNair wrote:I applied for HSMP in April 2007 (post Nov 2007)BUT, the basic difference is that HSMPian ( now Tire-1) who came after Nov '06 had to sign as acknowledgement that immigration law in UK can be changed in future and it can affect them.
I had to sign a declaration form that had these 2 separate points.
I confirm that I intend to make the UK my main home.
I am aware that the rules and regulations governing HSMP and leave applications may change in the future and I do not assume that the requirements covering any future applications will be the same.
If you read the Judicial review, you can see that the case was won mainly because of the I confirm that I intend to make the UK my main home.
So HSMPians after Nov 2006 also had a legitimate expectation that they would be able to settle.
They did take this clause out in the Tier 1 application. But then, people like us who had to extend our HSMPs did not have a choice but to apply using the Tier 1 application form that the HO provided us. The application would have been refused if we had not signed it[/i]
This is why i asked my last question. The assurance is no longer there fro tier 1 ians after Nov 06, instead, we accepted that the immigration laws might change. This makes a big difference.willnotbackHSMP wrote:So far I can recall , the judgment focused on FAQ of guied line which was published along with HSMP application form. At some point of FAQ it was stated that nothing will affect the applicant in case of change of immigration law in UK in future. The FAQ started its answer in this wayMJNair wrote:I applied for HSMP in April 2007 (post Nov 2007)BUT, the basic difference is that HSMPian ( now Tire-1) who came after Nov '06 had to sign as acknowledgement that immigration law in UK can be changed in future and it can affect them.
I had to sign a declaration form that had these 2 separate points.
I confirm that I intend to make the UK my main home.
I am aware that the rules and regulations governing HSMP and leave applications may change in the future and I do not assume that the requirements covering any future applications will be the same.
If you read the Judicial review, you can see that the case was won mainly because of the I confirm that I intend to make the UK my main home.
So HSMPians after Nov 2006 also had a legitimate expectation that they would be able to settle.
They did take this clause out in the Tier 1 application. But then, people like us who had to extend our HSMPs did not have a choice but to apply using the Tier 1 application form that the HO provided us. The application would have been refused if we had not signed it[/i]
' Not at all '
ldbright wrote:willnotbackHSMP wrote:I'm not solicitor, so can't comment about the win. But you see , always there is humanitarian ground exists in all cases like article 9 of Europian Law ( or another name - I forgot )
Thank you for replying. I think what we need is a body like hsmp ltd that can united and lead tier1ians. At least by doing this, we can consult a solicitor to have some clarification on this. – How did you guys get things started last time?