Extended family member

[hyfa]

Dear all I am an eea national.my non eea sister and her children living in non eea country as my dependent and also living in my hous hold.so is it possible to bring them here in uk? if possible then what i need to submit as finanshial evidence? Thanks in advance

[Guerro]

You should show the HO that you were living with them in the same household and that they are financially dependant on you. Once they are here, you should be exercising treaty rights

[vinny]

EUN2.7 Who are an EEA national’s extended family members?
EUN2.8 What supporting documents should family members include in their application?
EUN2.9 How do I establish dependency under the EEA Regulations?

[hyfa]

Ex

[hyfa]

Thanks for kind reply.They are my dependent .they are now living in my own house.but i lived with her long ago.i am working here in uk.so is it possible to do apply for fp?i hope any one can give my answer

[vinny]

See also EEA family permit for non-eea family member ( brother )

[Obie]

Also please see the Judgement below.

43. In my judgment, Metock does not impact on these propositions. I accept that Article 3.2(a) is based on the same policy considerations as Article 2.2 – "ensuring the protection of the family life of nationals of the Member States in order to eliminate obstacles to the exercise of the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the EC Treaty" (here the right of free movement and residence of the Union citizen) and aiming "to strengthen the right of free movement and residence of all Union citizens". That is why the Directive goes beyond Article 2.2 family members and makes provision, albeit in a different way, for OFMs. However, the emphasis remains on elimination of obstacles to the Treaty rights of the Union citizen rather than a policy of family reunification. Thus, OFMs who seek to travel from a different country to that from which the Union citizen is moving or has recently moved cannot without more be said to be members of his household. Similarly, whilst an OFM in a non-Member State may be financially dependent upon a Union citizen because he is provided with accommodation or living expenses by the Union citizen, there is no reason why the Union citizen's movement to the host Member State would be discouraged. The OFM could continue to benefit from the accommodation or the income after the Union citizen has exercised his rights in the host Member State. I accept Mr Palmer's submission that it is only those OFMs who have been present with the Union citizen in the country from which he has most recently come whose ability or inability to move with him could impact on his exercise of his primary right. This also explains Buxton LJ's requirement of very recent dependency or household membership. Historic but lapsed dependency or membership is irrelevant to the Directive policy of removing obstacles to the Union citizen's freedom of movement and residence rights. Unlike Article 2.2 "family members", it cannot be said of them that "the refusal … to grant them a right of residence is equally liable to discourage [the] Union citizen from continuing to reside in that Member State" (Metock, paragraph 92). Accordingly, I conclude that these aspects of Article 3.2(a) are not affected by Metock and that, in these respects, KG and AK remains good law.

[hyfa]

Many thanks for kind reply.so now my question is i need to live with them before application or not? Thanks