- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
RFL5.2 When must I refuse under paragraph 320? wrote:Subject to paragraph 320(7C) (see RFL5.4),...
‘Overstaying’ means the applicant has overstayed their leave to enter / remain, not just stayed longer than they said they would. The rule requires that the applicant has overstayed for more than 28 days (or for any period if, after overstaying, he went home at public expense including AVR or similar programme).
Thanks for the prompt response.vinny wrote:RFL5.2 When must I refuse under paragraph 320? wrote:Subject to paragraph 320(7C) (see RFL5.4),...
‘Overstaying’ means the applicant has overstayed their leave to enter / remain, not just stayed longer than they said they would. The rule requires that the applicant has overstayed for more than 28 days (or for any period if, after overstaying, he went home at public expense including AVR or similar programme).
Therefore, in your case, unless the initial application is deemed valid, I believe you became an overstayer the day your leave to enter / remain expired. And the 28 day period started from that day.Section 3C wrote:To benefit, a person must have existing leave to enter or remain at the time when their valid application is made.
Ah ok, thanks.sushdmehta wrote:As per my understanding, both invalid applications and out-of-time applications do not have Section 3C protection.Therefore, in your case, unless the initial application is deemed valid, I believe you became an overstayer the day your leave to enter / remain expired. And the 28 day period started from that day.Section 3C wrote:To benefit, a person must have existing leave to enter or remain at the time when their valid application is made.
regards