- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
muir wrote:Hello there - I am hoping someone can help me. A very close friend of mine (Sarah) needs to apply for her child (Julie) to become an Irish citizen. Here is the scenario:
Sarah came to Ireland in 2006 while pregnant with Julie. Julie was born early 2007. They have been here since - seeking asylum. I am not sure if this affects the process of naturalisation or not.
My queston is --> Is Sarah entitled to apply for Julie's citizenship because Julie was born in Ireland? I realise Julie does not automatically qualify for citizenship after 2005 but she is now 3 years old and has lived her entire life in Ireland. Surely this gives her some sort of right to apply for citizenship even though her mother is not from Europe and is seeking asylum herself here in Ireland.
Any help you can give us would be greatly greatly appreciated because we are finding it very difficult to trawl through all the various references and legal jargon - there doesn't seem to be any definitive place where we can go to get a clear answer.
Thanks in advance!
Muir
muir wrote:Thank you walrusgumble for your reply. However, I was already aware of this situation. I was hoping for someone to tell me whether the process of naturalisation for a child born in Ireland is different to an adult seeking asylum.
It is becoming more apparent to me that this is not the case.
Also, I have to question your semantics - my friend is not "illegal" she is an asylum seeker and due to the fact that everyone has a recognised human right to seek asylum and that she notified officials upon her arrival, she has a right to be in Ireland while their case is being decided.
Why is it incredible? The family are seeking asylum. THey have to show that they are entitled to a declaration of refugee status first. Because of regular appeals and High Court cases, it takes longer. (ie RAT and not leave to remain part). Why should there be credit? Many asylum seekers get lucky in that they are in the process for 4-7 years via 2-3 successful High Court cases with 3-4 RAT decisions and yet fail to get asylum.(they though though get leave to remain, often simply because of the time here)muir wrote:Thanks Fatty Patty - so basically the State sees the child born to an asylum seeker as an asylum seekers also...even though she was born in the country and so her time in the state does not count when applying for naturalisation?
So basically, if they are seeking asylum here for another 5 years none of that time counts?? That's incredible...