ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Ending the Link between Economic Migration and PR

General UK immigration & work permits; don't post job search or family related topics!

Please use this section of the board if there is no specific section for your query.

Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator

Locked
nskumar
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:41 am

Ending the Link between Economic Migration and PR

Post by nskumar » Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:30 pm

The next settlement reform would be Ending the Link between Economic Migration and PR as per the Coalition Government. What does this mean. Is it for new comers or is it for people already here in the UK. When would this change come.

[iD]
Senior Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:36 am

Re: Ending the Link between Economic Migration and PR

Post by [iD] » Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:38 pm

nskumar wrote:The next settlement reform would be Ending the Link between Economic Migration and PR as per the Coalition Government. What does this mean. Is it for new comers or is it for people already here in the UK. When would this change come.
Source please?
Goodluck.

nskumar
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:41 am

Re: Ending the Link between Economic Migration and PR

Post by nskumar » Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:17 pm

The Prime Ministers speech yesterday
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13083781

I want Britain to continue to attract the best workers.

But it cannot be right that people coming to fill short-term skills gaps can stay long-term.

As the Cross-Party Balanced Migration Group has argued, it is essential we break that link between temporary visas and permanent settlement.

They are right - that's what this Government is determined to do…

…and we will consult on how best to proceed on this in the coming months.

geriatrix
Moderator
Posts: 24755
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: does it matter?
United Kingdom

Re: Ending the Link between Economic Migration and PR

Post by geriatrix » Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:31 pm

nskumar wrote:…and we will consult on how best to proceed on this in the coming months.
The who, how and when can only be answered when the government announces its strategy.

If the government hasn't yet decided, how do you expect anyone else to know?
Life isn't fair, but you can be!

nskumar
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:41 am

Re: Ending the Link between Economic Migration and PR

Post by nskumar » Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:50 pm

When people entered UK 4 or 5 years ago, there had been no mention that the Settlement rules will change or the opportunity to settle in UK would be removed. The Settlement rules are subject to change was a text in UKBA which was brought in or around June 2008. however it does not mention that there would be no opportunity to apply for settlement.

Do we not have any grounds to file a JR based on this, because many people were counting the years by paying proper taxes and following the rules in UK hoping to get settlement in UK and with a legitimate expectation.

If this had been known to us before starting the migrant journey, many people would have chosen a different country. I entered this country expecting to Settle. I also do not understand the term work visas are temporary skill gaps. We have come to UK with a Permanent Job offer in a UK WorkPermit. The Job offer does not specify it as a contract. How come this can be treated as people come to UK just for short term work.

geriatrix
Moderator
Posts: 24755
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: does it matter?
United Kingdom

Post by geriatrix » Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:33 pm

IIRC, WP holders have already lost a legal challenge that they launched on the assumption of "legitimate expectation" to fight the increase in residential qualification period from 4 years to 5 years.

In context of economic migrants:
WP migrants can still apply for settlement, so can Tier 1 (General) migrants. Likewise, Tier 2 (General) migrants and a section of Tier 2 (ICT) migrants also can.
Those who are no longer eligible for settlement are the ones that entered the PBS system in 2010 or later (e.g. - Tier 2 (ICT) from 06-Apr-10).

While it is easy for a person with no legal understanding to come to a conclusion that "because xyz condition was not mentioned in a said document when I applied so I have a ground for JR", the fact is that legal interpretation and scope of such statements (or absence thereof) in such documents can only be done by people qualified to do such legal interpretation(s) and analysis.

Also, HSMP JRs seem to have become a "convenient precedent" for anyone irritated / frustrated by the changes to immigration rules since then but it is absolutely important that people first clearly understand the basis on which those challenges were launched and won.

I believe a JR must be initiated within 3 months of the changes being implemented, so there is ample time for legal consultation(s) ... whoever wishes to take the route. Do take into account the fact that JRs are expensive business .... and really really expensive if you lose!
Life isn't fair, but you can be!

geriatrix
Moderator
Posts: 24755
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: does it matter?
United Kingdom

Post by geriatrix » Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:47 pm

Please note that the speech refers to breaking the link between "temporary workers" and "settlement", but your argument (in the second post of yours) refers to you as a "WP migrant" - a category that (still) leads to settlement.

No link between the question in your opening post and your present circumstances.
Life isn't fair, but you can be!

nskumar
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:41 am

Post by nskumar » Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:58 pm

sushdmehta wrote:Please note that the speech refers to breaking the link between "temporary workers" and "settlement", but your argument (in the second post of yours) refers to you as a "WP migrant" - a category that (still) leads to settlement.

No link between the question in your opening post and your present circumstances.
I have interpreted that the speech refers to all economic routes(Tier1 & Tier2) as temporary visas.[/quote]

nskumar
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:41 am

Post by nskumar » Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:01 pm

But the most significant route to permanent settlement is the economic migration route.

Last year, 84,000 people who initially came on a work visa got the right to settle here.

I want Britain to continue to attract the best workers.

But it cannot be right that people coming to fill short-term skills gaps can stay long-term.
This is what has been mentioned in the speech which made me interpret as all economic routes(Tier1 and Tier2)

geriatrix
Moderator
Posts: 24755
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: does it matter?
United Kingdom

Post by geriatrix » Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:06 pm

If you read carefully, you'll note that your interpretation is flawed.
Life isn't fair, but you can be!

Aryan2013
Member of Standing
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:49 pm

Post by Aryan2013 » Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:11 pm

nskumar wrote:
sushdmehta wrote:Please note that the speech refers to breaking the link between "temporary workers" and "settlement", but your argument (in the second post of yours) refers to you as a "WP migrant" - a category that (still) leads to settlement.

No link between the question in your opening post and your present circumstances.
I have interpreted that the speech refers to all economic routes(Tier1 & Tier2) as temporary visas.
[/quote]

All visa's are TEMPORARY, for your kind information.

nskumar
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:41 am

Post by nskumar » Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:15 pm

sushdmehta wrote:If you read carefully, you'll note that your interpretation is flawed.
I know that you have a very good understanding as I have gone through most of your comments. May I request you to please provide clarification related to the flaw in my interpretation. Atleast it would help me to still continue hoping for ILR as I am due in mid October this year

geriatrix
Moderator
Posts: 24755
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: does it matter?
United Kingdom

Post by geriatrix » Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:19 pm

If you are a WP migrant / Tier 2 (General) / HSMP migrant / Tier 1 (General) migrant / pre-06-Apr-10 Tier 2 (ICT) migrant, you may apply for settlement as and when you fulfil the settlement requirements.
Life isn't fair, but you can be!

nskumar
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:41 am

Post by nskumar » Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:28 pm

sushdmehta wrote:If you are a WP migrant / Tier 2 (General) / HSMP migrant / Tier 1 (General) migrant / pre-06-Apr-10 Tier 2 (ICT) migrant, you may apply for settlement as and when you fulfil the settlement requirements.
Well. This is the current status. My argument was regarding the speech of PM which states as below

it is essential we break that link between temporary visas and permanent settlement

Temporary Visas (Tier1 and Tier2)

geriatrix
Moderator
Posts: 24755
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: does it matter?
United Kingdom

Post by geriatrix » Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:36 pm

:?
The current status applies until such time the status is changed. Unless a change in status is announced, how can you expect anyone to tell you one way or the other!

:roll:
Life isn't fair, but you can be!

Locked