Upper Tribunal Directions

[angie4489]

Hey everyone

Please could you help me understand this. I just received a letter from UT. Let me type what they said. Basically I don't understand what I have to do or what is meant. Ok here goes

'1. The respondent opposes the challenge to the determination of the Immigration Judge by way of the letter dated 21/03/11
2. Should the Upper Tribunal find a material of law in the decision of the First Tier Tribunal, it shall make a decision without adjourning the hearing as the appelant's representatives have indicated that no oral eveidence is considered necessary. The parties are therefore directed to be ready to proceed on the substantive grounds as well as the error of law issue.
3. No later than 14 days prior to the hearing the parties are to serve any additional documentary evidence upon which they propose to rely should an error be found.'

I do understand part 2 and 3, although no date of hearing has been given but no1 doesn't make sense as I already received a letter in early March from the Upper Tribunal finding errors of law from the original decision. Does this mean the HO are opposing those errors of law? Does this mean that I am either awaiting a determination from UT or awaiting error of law which will mean another bundle being sent to UT? and if bundle has to done, will they want the same evidence as before or more?

Am sorry if I am confusing anyone. this is driving me crazy. it has been 7 months of hell!!![/b]

[shahzad80]

...........

[Greenie]

Angie do you have a solicitor?

[angie4489]

thanks for your replies. @Shahzad I will pm you tomorrow. @Greenie yes I do have a solicitor but to be honest he is very reluctant. I even had to force him to apply for permission to appeal. and when we got a reply back to say it has been granted, he couldn't believe it. but I can't change him now. Don't have any more money to pay anyone else. Paid approx £2500 so far.