- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
I think we are replyimh at the same time Casa. the problem with asking for the visa to be post dated is that presumably by then she will have had the baby. Even if she is successful with applying for the visa (if they grant it outside the rules) she may well not be permitted to fly once she is in her third trimester. This really is appalling behaviour by UKBA enforcing removal of a heavily pregnant 20 year old, and very cynical. clearly they knew that if they waited much longer they would not have been able to enforce removal because she would be too pregnant to fly. Now she is probably stuck in SA until after the birth of the child.Casa wrote:Definately the age limit of 21 is still in place and covers all spouse and fiance visa applications. There has been a 'successful' appeal recently in the High Court, but as the Home Office are appealing this decision, a change in the Ruling isn't imminent. The Biometric appointment bears no significance as to whether the application is valid unfortunately. If you apply now for a fiance visa you risk losing the application fee. At best, I believe your fiancee could apply 3 months prior to her 21st birthday and ask for the entry visa to be postdated for after she reaches the qualifying age.
Regrettably the age restriction has left married couples with children separated...some who are looking at being apart for several years. Hopefully the Home Office will lose the appeal and the restriction will be removed.
Thanks guys! the baby is DUE on august 14th, she turns 21 on october the 29th. so the baby will already be here by then. they were very heavy handed indeed with the removal, she is 28 weeks on sunday, which would mean MANY Stupid wouldnt fly her on a 13 hour longhaul flight.Greenie wrote:I think we are replyimh at the same time Casa. the problem with asking for the visa to be post dated is that presumably by then she will have had the baby. Even if she is successful with applying for the visa (if they grant it outside the rules) she may well not be permitted to fly once she is in her third trimester. This really is appalling behaviour by UKBA enforcing removal of a heavily pregnant 20 year old, and very cynical. clearly they knew that if they waited much longer they would not have been able to enforce removal because she would be too pregnant to fly. Now she is probably stuck in SA until after the birth of the child.Casa wrote:Definately the age limit of 21 is still in place and covers all spouse and fiance visa applications. There has been a 'successful' appeal recently in the High Court, but as the Home Office are appealing this decision, a change in the Ruling isn't imminent. The Biometric appointment bears no significance as to whether the application is valid unfortunately. If you apply now for a fiance visa you risk losing the application fee. At best, I believe your fiancee could apply 3 months prior to her 21st birthday and ask for the entry visa to be postdated for after she reaches the qualifying age.
Regrettably the age restriction has left married couples with children separated...some who are looking at being apart for several years. Hopefully the Home Office will lose the appeal and the restriction will be removed.
21 is the age. no hope of a UK birth nowFaithwolf wrote:Does the spouse visa have a 21 rule too? I assume it does, but cant find any clarification on it?
If not, could I not just go over, marry her, and then bring her back on a spouse visa?
Either way... there isnt much hope of my baby being born in england is there? :<
i wouldn't necessarily blame the CAB i presume they advised her to claim asylum upon her instructions that she feared returning there (the OP states they left for Oman because of the 'dangers' in South Africa), whether or not the claim was viable was another matter but given the problems with applying for FLR(O) outside the rules, being refused and having no right of appeal unless a decision to remove is made, it is quite common for reps to advise the person to claim asylum if they express a fear as this means they can also raise article 8 issues which will also need to be considered at the same time.mochyn wrote:OMG what appalling advice and treatment given out by the CAB and UKBA
but what you should do now is to minimise the time you are apart and make the process of getting her back to the UK as easy as possible.
Go to SA to marry either before the birth of the baby or after then she
should apply for a spousal visa and then wait until she is 21 to enter the UK
Do not think it would at all and you would separate a young baby from its mum and who would care for it while you were waiting - perhaps not a great ideaFaithwolf wrote:ah, well, regular income I can definately do.
this is a theoretical situation. so bear with me!
what IF. baby gets born in SA. now, itll be british (or so im told?) if it carries my name on the birth cert, married or not. and I was to fly out there and then bring the baby back with me. would this help the process?
I mean, Im not under and neither will my child be under a ny restrictions of anything, or claiming benefits etc (not that I wish to.)
and IF we were to do this. leaving my partner there. would it make it easier to get her here? (and would it help THAT if we shared the same surname/married)
Sorry to keep asking question after question, as im sure you can understand, Im very frustrated!
and thanks once again for all your fantastic help