- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
As you can see from her post, her husband have ILR so there is No point him applying for PR under eu law.fysicus wrote:As your husband is self-employed, he should be paying Class 2 National Insurance (currently at £2.50 per week, unless he falls under the small earnings exception), do you have kept any proof of that over the past years?
If he sent in tax returns for income tax, you can phone the tax office and ask for printout of his tax records of the last six years or so. They normally send this very quickly, free of charge. You can also ask for confirmation that NI has been paid for the last six years.
Your husband being self-employed and paying NI exempts you from the requirement of sickness insurance for both of you.
Your legal status in the UK does not change after the expiry of your residence card, so you don't have to worry about overstaying and things like that. However, an employer may want to see evidence issued by UKBA about your status but as long as they don't ask for it nothing will happen.
For your husband only the period after Poland became a member of EU is relevant (and for yourself only the period after your marriage). It is irrelevant that he was in the UK before may 2004. Your husband could of course have applied for PR himself (form EEA3) already in mid-2009, that would have made it easier to convince UKBA.
As Punjab mentioned, you can also apply for a new Residence Card now (form EEA2) and sort out the PR later.
I think you need to read more carefully:boloney wrote:As you can see from her post, her husband have ILR so there is No point him applying for PR under eu law.
Obviously UKBA demands that she proves her husband is entitled to PR under the EEA regulations.moon_flower wrote:The enclosed letter from HO said that I need to provide more evidence that my husband was exercising his treaty rights and residing in the UK for 5 years.
fysicus wrote:I think you need to read more carefully:boloney wrote:As you can see from her post, her husband have ILR so there is No point him applying for PR under eu law.Obviously UKBA demands that she proves her husband is entitled to PR under the EEA regulations.moon_flower wrote:The enclosed letter from HO said that I need to provide more evidence that my husband was exercising his treaty rights and residing in the UK for 5 years.
moon_flower wrote:2. On the other hand, do we need to prove it? He lived in this country for over 10 years. Would that exempt us from providing any treaty right proof? Can I use some other application to apply, eg as a wife of a person with Indefinite Leave to Remain in the UK. What proof do I need to provide for this? I was looking at SET(M) form which looks suitable but I am not too sure I can apply if I am already on EEA route.
op does`t have problem with husband PR app but with her own. If he(husband) been granted ILR before 2006 (take into account he was in the UK for about 10 years, so long before Polnd joined EU) there is no point him applying for PR under EU law now, ILR (domestic law) and PR (EU law) give the same rights.fysicus wrote:A very childish reaction, boloney! You are not adding value for OP, just confusing her. Even immigration lawyers sometimes talk about ILR when they actually mean PR, or vice versa.
However, we can safely assume that UKBA is aware of the immigration status (whatever it is) of moon_flower's husband, and if they demand that she proves that he is entitled to PR under EEA Regulations, how can you maintain that "there is No point him applying for PR under eu law"?
How much clearer do you need it? moon_flower needs five years residence in accordance with EEA Regulations, and one of the requirements for that is that her Polish husband was exercising treaty rights (or had PR under EEA Regulations) during those five years. Whatever status he may have (in parallel) under UK national immigration rules (and moon_flower is not very explicit about it) doesn't really matter, and of course he could not exercise treaty rights before Poland joined the EU.moon_flower wrote:I applied for PR via EEA4 application but had my application returned. The enclosed letter from HO said that I need to provide more evidence that my husband was exercising his treaty rights and residing in the UK for 5 years.
So, if someone Have ILR he can apply for PR ?fysicus wrote:How much clearer do you need it? moon_flower needs five years residence in accordance with EEA Regulations, and one of the requirements for that is that her Polish husband was exercising treaty rights (or had PR under EEA Regulations) during those five years. Whatever status he may have (in parallel) under UK national immigration rules (and moon_flower is not very explicit about it) doesn't really matter, and of course he could not exercise treaty rights before Poland joined the EU.moon_flower wrote:I applied for PR via EEA4 application but had my application returned. The enclosed letter from HO said that I need to provide more evidence that my husband was exercising his treaty rights and residing in the UK for 5 years.
ILR under domestic law and PR under EU law are not the same, and moon-flower's situation highlights one of the subtle differences.
Of course, there is nothing in the EEA Regulations that prohibits it. Regardless of your status under domestic law (whether you are illegal or have ILR) you can apply under the EEA Regulations and if you meet the requirements it will be successfulboloney wrote:So, if someone Have ILR he can apply for PR ?
Of course both give you the right to live and work in the UK without a time limit, that's why many people regard them as being the same as these two rights are usually the ones that matter most.boloney wrote:Can you explain difference between ILR and PR, what right give you ILR and PR?