- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Hi Lupilulupilu wrote:i know my post is not relevant to this thread but i am sure there must be some one how can answer my query. i am worried plz someone answer me
Finally got my ILR yesterdaygid1818 wrote:12 days after the caseworker has made a decision and still waiting to get my passport. Called them yesterday and was told there is nothing in the post for me.chrisrich wrote:Happy for you gid1818, hope you get your ILR very soon
hi lupilu, you have nothing to worry about, apply for indefinite leave on Set M, homeoffice is more intrested in the relationship (genuine) than finances. Just submit all the relevant documents.lupilu wrote:i know my post is not relevant to this thread but i am sure there must be some one how can answer my query. i am worried plz someone answer me
gid1818 wrote:Finally got my ILR yesterdaygid1818 wrote:12 days after the caseworker has made a decision and still waiting to get my passport. Called them yesterday and was told there is nothing in the post for me.chrisrich wrote:Happy for you gid1818, hope you get your ILR very soon![]()
below is the time line
application submitted 21/11/2011
fee deducted 22/11/2011
acknowledgmenet letter received 24/11/2012 dated 23/11/2012
09/02/2012 letter received from caseworker confirming lost of documents.
documents found and ILR stamped 24/02/2012
received passport 10/02/2012.
thanks all for the help and encouragement especially when UKBA lost my documents. I wish everyone waiting all the best; it will take time but you please be rest assured that you will definitely receive your ILR.
Yes it does seem that most Set M applications are being dealt with quite quickly. This makes our wait even tougher - we just can't fathom out why we are waiting so long.hsmp2010 wrote:from above success stories it looks like no happiness still for SET(O)JR as above r majority from SET (O) and SET(M). it looks like we have to wait long 20 to 24 weeks
Hi spotspot wrote:Yes it does seem that most Set M applications are being dealt with quite quickly. This makes our wait even tougher - we just can't fathom out why we are waiting so long.hsmp2010 wrote:from above success stories it looks like no happiness still for SET(O)JR as above r majority from SET (O) and SET(M). it looks like we have to wait long 20 to 24 weeks
We are now convinced that our application actually started from when we received the acknowledgement letter (13th Jan), rather than when we submitted the application (Oct 11th).
Congratulations to those who have received their ILR so far.
Ours is definitely not a straightforward case, but we did include lots of explanations and back up letters etc. We even went through the checking service to speed things up.boniface wrote:Hi spotspot wrote:Yes it does seem that most Set M applications are being dealt with quite quickly. This makes our wait even tougher - we just can't fathom out why we are waiting so long.hsmp2010 wrote:from above success stories it looks like no happiness still for SET(O)JR as above r majority from SET (O) and SET(M). it looks like we have to wait long 20 to 24 weeks
We are now convinced that our application actually started from when we received the acknowledgement letter (13th Jan), rather than when we submitted the application (Oct 11th).
Congratulations to those who have received their ILR so far.
I have recently read somewhere that cases are first checked by initial consideration unit and if they are straightforward they are decided there and then. But if they are not straightforward they are assigned to a casework group. These groups are assigned different application types (not just setm or seto) and they consider them in an order. Each group processes one application at a time.
I always thought my application was straightforward and I still think the same but may be for some reason the person who checked my application didn't think it was straightforward. I think that's why we are still waiting. Most of the SET M applications are easier to process and can be decided by initial consideration unit and that's why they take shorter time than SET O applications.
If you applied for SET M and your application was assigned to a casework group, you have to wait in the same queue with all other types of applications. The time you have to wait will depend on the speed of the casework group you are assigned to. Good luck to everyone.
setMyasin wrote:Hi Gaku, seems as tho your waiting quite a long time now.. Have you rung HO for any updates on your case?gaku wrote:A lot of very good news today, congs to those who have got ILR this week
i am still in waiting list hope ill receive my soon good luck guys
I hope you get your ILR soon
u right boss i did ring and HO told me my case with case worker at the movement ill hear soon form them
Not all SET (M) 's are being processed quickly! My wife applied mid October 2011!spot wrote:Yes it does seem that most Set M applications are being dealt with quite quickly. This makes our wait even tougher - we just can't fathom out why we are waiting so long.hsmp2010 wrote:from above success stories it looks like no happiness still for SET(O)JR as above r majority from SET (O) and SET(M). it looks like we have to wait long 20 to 24 weeks
We are now convinced that our application actually started from when we received the acknowledgement letter (13th Jan), rather than when we submitted the application (Oct 11th).
Congratulations to those who have received their ILR so far.
Ours is the most straight forward SET (M) imaginable yet 20 weeks on we have not heard a dickie-bird!spot wrote:Ours is definitely not a straightforward case, but we did include lots of explanations and back up letters etc. We even went through the checking service to speed things up.boniface wrote:Hi spotspot wrote:Yes it does seem that most Set M applications are being dealt with quite quickly. This makes our wait even tougher - we just can't fathom out why we are waiting so long.hsmp2010 wrote:from above success stories it looks like no happiness still for SET(O)JR as above r majority from SET (O) and SET(M). it looks like we have to wait long 20 to 24 weeks
We are now convinced that our application actually started from when we received the acknowledgement letter (13th Jan), rather than when we submitted the application (Oct 11th).
Congratulations to those who have received their ILR so far.
I have recently read somewhere that cases are first checked by initial consideration unit and if they are straightforward they are decided there and then. But if they are not straightforward they are assigned to a casework group. These groups are assigned different application types (not just setm or seto) and they consider them in an order. Each group processes one application at a time.
I always thought my application was straightforward and I still think the same but may be for some reason the person who checked my application didn't think it was straightforward. I think that's why we are still waiting. Most of the SET M applications are easier to process and can be decided by initial consideration unit and that's why they take shorter time than SET O applications.
If you applied for SET M and your application was assigned to a casework group, you have to wait in the same queue with all other types of applications. The time you have to wait will depend on the speed of the casework group you are assigned to. Good luck to everyone.
If the service was free, then OK, but it's not, it's expensive!
Hello bob-russellbob-russell wrote:Ours is the most straight forward SET (M) imaginable yet 20 weeks on we have not heard a dickie-bird!spot wrote:Ours is definitely not a straightforward case, but we did include lots of explanations and back up letters etc. We even went through the checking service to speed things up.boniface wrote:Hi spotspot wrote:
Yes it does seem that most Set M applications are being dealt with quite quickly. This makes our wait even tougher - we just can't fathom out why we are waiting so long.
We are now convinced that our application actually started from when we received the acknowledgement letter (13th Jan), rather than when we submitted the application (Oct 11th).
Congratulations to those who have received their ILR so far.
I have recently read somewhere that cases are first checked by initial consideration unit and if they are straightforward they are decided there and then. But if they are not straightforward they are assigned to a casework group. These groups are assigned different application types (not just setm or seto) and they consider them in an order. Each group processes one application at a time.
I always thought my application was straightforward and I still think the same but may be for some reason the person who checked my application didn't think it was straightforward. I think that's why we are still waiting. Most of the SET M applications are easier to process and can be decided by initial consideration unit and that's why they take shorter time than SET O applications.
If you applied for SET M and your application was assigned to a casework group, you have to wait in the same queue with all other types of applications. The time you have to wait will depend on the speed of the casework group you are assigned to. Good luck to everyone.
If the service was free, then OK, but it's not, it's expensive!