ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

HUBBY HAS RECVD NEWS ABOUT SPOUSE VISA

General UK immigration & work permits; don't post job search or family related topics!

Please use this section of the board if there is no specific section for your query.

Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

HUBBY HAS RECVD NEWS ABOUT SPOUSE VISA

Post by rainbow24 » Sun Feb 04, 2007 4:34 pm

Hi everyone,

A decision on my hubby's spouse visa was supposed to be made on 22nd January by British High Commission in Islamabad. When I typed his passport number into the tracker on Visadropbox (Gerry Fedex website), this is what the message said.

' Your visa application/passport has been processed on Wednesday 31st January 2007. Please come to the Gerry/Fedex Office to collect it. Please bring with you the original receipt and your NIC (National Insurance Card)'.

What does this mean? 'Your passport has been processed'. Does this mean he has got the visa? We are not going to find out until Wednesday because Monday and Tuesday is an Islamic Holiday in Pakistan so everything is closed. I am so nervous.

Also, hubby was worried that there would be an interview. If there was to be an interview, wouldn't Islambad have gotton in touch with him before now??

I would be grateful for anyone's advice. Thankyou

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England
United Kingdom

Post by John » Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:23 pm

Rainbow, please do appreciate that what follows is absolutely not guaranteed .... the only way to find out for certain will be to pick up the passport on Wednesday .... however ... I suspect that if a decision has been made without an interview taking place ... it is good news!

That is, if they felt that after looking at the supporting evidence, it was necessary to schedule an interview, well they would have done that, but in the absence of an interview ... and a decision having been taken .... it should be good news.

But I emphasise again .... this is not guaranteed!
John

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:12 pm

John

As far as I know, Gerry Fedex is a courier company who deliver and collect visa applications to and from the embassy. I understand that for security reasons applicants are not allowed to approach the embassy themselves.

When my husband gave his application to Gerry Fedex, he was given a reference number. He uses this reference number on the tracking system on Gerry Fedex webiste to view the status of his application. What I don't understand is, if Gerry Fedex is only a courier company how could they know the status of my husbands application?? Does the British High Commission inform Gerry Fedex about the status of a persons application, and in turn Gerry Fedex enters the status in their tracking system on their website? How does it all work? I'm confused.

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:22 pm

Just wanted to add to my last message. If my husbands visa was rejected, wouldn't we have heard before now? The fact that he is collecting his passport on Wednesday as per Gerry Fedex message, what does this all mean? And how does the courier company know if the application is processed or not? Do they check through all the mail that they collect from the embassy. I just don't get it.

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England
United Kingdom

Post by John » Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:22 pm

f Gerry Fedex is only a courier company how could they know the status of my husbands application?? Does the British High Commission inform Gerry Fedex about the status of a persons application, and in turn Gerry Fedex enters the status in their tracking system on their website?
I suspect that it is possible to guarantee one thing, namely, Gerry do not know the result of the application. They merely know that there is a sealed envelope waiting to be collected!

I suspect it is as simple as Gerry being given a sealed envelope, on to which has been written sufficient identifying detail, and then they update their computer system to say that the envelope awaits collection. Merely that.

Rainbow, stop panicking! I look forward to reading your good news on Wednesday.
John

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:25 pm

My husband contacted the Gerry Fedex agency in Islamabad to find out if he can go and collect his application/passport which was processed by the British High Comission in Pakistan and sent back to the office. Someone at Gerry Fedex told him that there is currently a long queue of people waiting to collect their applications, and that it could take a month before he is called to collect his.

I am not satisfied with this and have tried to call Gerry Fedex but surprise surprise...you are stuck in a queue and can never get through to human being!!! I have even tried calling the embassy, but all I get is an answer machine asking you to call back in 15minutes as the lines are busy. 15minutes later when you try to call again the same thing happens, and this continues throughout the day EVERY DAY!!!

My hubby has received the following message on the Gerry Fedex Website and I would be grateful if someone could clarify exactly what this means:

Your Visa Application/Passport has been processed and has been received at the Gerry Fedex office, please come and collect it bringing with you your National Identity Card and your original recepit.

Does this mean that a decision has been made?
Does it suggest that he has his visa?
Could he still be asked to attend an interview?
Could a rejection letter be sitting in the office along with his application, or do the embassies send a rejection letter out in advance to the applicants address if their case is rejected?

Please help because I am going out of my mind!!


Thankyou so much

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:28 pm

Sorry John, my mistake. I have posted the above message under my previous message.

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:08 pm

I am sorry this message is so long, please read because we seriously need help.

I stated in my last message that my husband contacted Gerry Fedex and was told that it would take a month before he would be called to the office to pick up his applicaton/passport as they currently have a long queue of people. My husband called the office again last Friday and spoke to another member of staff. He was told that could come and collect his application same day! Don't know what on earth is going on with Gerry Fedex in Islamabad as they seem to be giving out contradicting information.

Anyway, my husband went to the office and despite receiving a message on their website saying that his visa application/passport had been processed, (we thought that he had the visa!!) he received an interview letter instead. He has to attend an interview at the British High Comission on Tuesday 13th February.

The BHC has requested the following information which he has to take with him

1) Any letters from the Home Office which may have received during his stay in the UK

2) Any passports that he has ever held

3) Any other supporting information which may help his case.

My husband never approached the home office during his stay in the UK, so he has no letters from them. He was illegal and stayed in this country for a total of 6 years.

As for any passports that he has every held, well he came here to this country when he was 16 years old and the agent who accompanied him to the UK basically took care of eveything. My husband does not recall whether the passport he used to bring him here was fake because he never got the chance to see the passport as the agent had it with him the whole time. He has absolutely no idea how he came here and to make matters worse, the agent said goodbye to him at the airport and he never seen him again, left no contact details, nothing.

I am worried that this will go against him. Also the Immigration Officer at the embarkment point at Heathrow Airport stopped him on the way out of the country when he went back to Pakistan last year to apply for his spouse visa. He left the country voluntarily, but was still issued with a letter. Unfotunately, the letter is with him in Pakistan so I can't relay this word for word but the reference number is IS159 and is entitled Notice to a person liable for removal. It talks about how he is an illegal immigrant and how he may be liable for removal under the immigration act of 1971. When I questioned this letter with Immigration at Heathrow, they were so rude and one person said "Whether he left the country voluntarily or was deported, the letters all mean the same thing. Face facts, your husband is illegal, had no right to be here and that's it, there is no chance he will get back in to this country, end of story" and slammed the phone down.

The fact that he was 16 years old when he came to this country and still very young to understand what was going on, will this help his case? They may turn round and say " Well, why didn't you tell the home office you were here when you were an adult"? and he doesn't know how to respond to his because obviously the real reason he didn't go to the home office was because he was afraid of being sent back to Pakistan to a village which is very poor. The BHC will grill him about this because it is only since he got married to me that he has gone back to his country and applied through the proper legal channels.

Please help. We only have 3 days left. Already 3 people have had interviews in Pakistan that we know about and all 3 have had their cases rejected. I have a son who was born last month and his father has never seen him. If we go down the appeal route it will take many months and even then there is no guarantee.

Any advice welcome.

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:22 pm

John/Antontony/Jeffalbright,

I have been sifting through other posts to try to find a case similar to my husbands. As well as the advice needed to the questions above which I posted today, can you also tell me if a spouse visa can be rejected on the grounds that a person has entered the UK illegally and has stayed for 6 years.

If that is the case, why does the government encourage all illegal immigrants to go back to their country and go through the proper legal channels? I just wondered if they could refuse my husband his visa on that basis alone. I should point out that he has no criminal convictions and has a new born baby in the UK.

I am in desperate need of help here. I do apologise for going on and on...but I am concerned for my baby who is right now without his daddy and god forbid might never get the chance to see him.

Jeff Albright
Senior Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:25 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Post by Jeff Albright » Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:35 pm

What you need to do is just to sit back and relax. There is absolutely nothing you can do right now until Tuesday.

I cannot remember your previous posts but I understand that you have submitted all the documents required to apply for a spouse visa.
If you have shown that you have genuine relationship that lasted for some time, that you can support yourselves without public funds and that you have appropriate accommodation, there is no reason why this application should be refused.

Interview - is absolutely normal course of action. Certainly, the ECO may have questions firstly, in my view, in order to verify his identity and your relationship. Think for yourself - during his stay in the UK he never had passport or any contact with the IND. So what do you expect? THe IND never had any documents on him.
If I were an ECO I would called him for an interview without thinking twice. I would need to establish that he is the one he is telling he is and he is the one who is married to you, etc. How else would I know??

You are married, you have a child together and you intend to live together - why do you think he should be refused?
The ECO will be obliged by law to take into consideration both immigration grounds and human rights grounds.

I have no doubt that, if you were genuine throughout with them, he will get his spouse visa, maybe even on Tuesday.

So just chill out, take a deep breath and wait.

We hope to get some good news from you this week. Keep us posted!

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:47 pm

Thanks alot Jeff

Jeff should he tell the embassy he has been working in the UK? Would this affect his case? Obviously they will want to know how he has been supporting himself for the last 6 years, but at the same time he doesn't want this to affect his chances?

Jeff Albright
Senior Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:25 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Post by Jeff Albright » Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:43 pm

rainbow24 wrote: Jeff should he tell the embassy he has been working in the UK? Would this affect his case? Obviously they will want to know how he has been supporting himself for the last 6 years, but at the same time he doesn't want this to affect his chances?
The general rule is that you do not give out any information unless you are asked for it!

Whether or not he worked previously in the UK is irrelevant. What is relevant is that he has the job lined up in the UK, which he would take up upon his return and which would generate sufficient cash for you to adequately support yourselves without government's money. A letter from his employer would be useful in this regard.
Alternatively, if he does not yet have a job, he should have printed out bank statements on your both names showing sufficient funds to support yourselves, or if you are employed, he should have taken your pay slips to show the income to the family.
In order to succeed in his application, either of the above should have been provided.

eliasuk4u
Member of Standing
Posts: 346
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:27 pm

Post by eliasuk4u » Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:05 am

can you also tell me if a spouse visa can be rejected on the grounds that a person has entered the UK illegally and has stayed for 6 years.
The answer is no. It can't be rejected just for that reason alone.
why does the government encourage all illegal immigrants to go back to their country and go through the proper legal channels? I just wondered if they could refuse my husband his visa on that basis alone.
I was in that situation. I went back to my home country and applied for a spouse visa. I got spouse visa the very next day and the BHC didn't reject on the basis you mentioned above.

as long as you have all the documents required for a spouse visa, your husband will get his visa. Have a look through the link to see the documents I submitted to BHC, Colombo for my spouse visa.http://www.immigrationboards.com/viewtopic.php?t=12301

Jeff Albright
Senior Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:25 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Post by Jeff Albright » Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:35 pm

rainbow24 wrote: "Whether he left the country voluntarily or was deported, the letters all mean the same thing. Face facts, your husband is illegal, had no right to be here and that's it, there is no chance he will get back in to this country, end of story" and slammed the phone down.
The enforcement people and immigration escorts have a very low profile, low level of intelligence and education. Such attitude usually displays the lack of intelligence filled with the hatred for immigrants rather than the reasoning within the law.
You should base your judgements on the legal principles rather than on the twaddles blubbered by some stupid morons.

What you have been told would have been correct if your husband had been "deported". The law, however, only permits deportation of dangerous criminals, whose presence in the UK is not conducive to the public good. Others are "removed", i.e. it is open for them to return after having obtained the correct entry clearance

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:04 pm

Jeff, what you said in your last message took my by surprise. We were told by a solicitor that if my husband continued to live and work in this country and was caught by immigration, he would be deported and would not be allowed to re enter for 3 years.

I have heard that if an illegal immigrant stays in this country for 8 years he can apply for permanency. I am not sure if this is correct or not, but my husband was desperate to get his status sorted out straight away and so was I because we were living in fear that he would get caught at work and at the same time he couldn't give up his job and lie low for 2 years because we needed the money.

When I called the immigration manager at heathrow today to clarify things, he told me that if my husband was caught working in an indian takeway he would be served with the same letter he was given on the way out of the country which is the IS159 Notice of a person liable for removal and not necessarily a deportation letter/order. Which makes me think, why the heck did he go back to Pakistan in the first place. Why not just continue to work until he gets caught because they won't deport illegal immigrants unless they have a criminal record and are a danger to the public. Yes, he would still be told to leave the country, but at the same time he could still apply for a spouse visa. How would BHC in Islamabad know if he left the country volunatily or if he was caught, because he would still be issued with the same letter?

Regarding your suggestion to provide a letter to the BHC stating that my husband has a job for when he returns to the UK. This seems like a good idea, however I think we are too late now as the interview is on Tuesday. I have a full time job and have provided bank statements and 20 payslips including my P60. I am living in shared accomodation paying £250 per month which includes a large double bedroom and a box room for my baby and includes ALL bills and I bring home £1074 a month after tax. We have also had measurements done of the house which has passed and a letter has been provided confirming that the house is not overcrowded and is fit for entry clearance. I just don't know if they would consider my salary too low to look after myself, hubby and the baby. My husbands friend who is also a manager at McDonalds has offered him a job if he comes to the UK, however it is too late to get hold of a letter which is a real pitty. I just pray that Islamabad don't make this into an issue.

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:23 pm

eliasuk4u I just read your message and also used the link to find out what supporting documents you used for your spouse visa.

I think one of the reasons why you got your visa was because you tried to apply for asylum through the home office. My husband didn't even try to do that!! He just lay low for 6 years until he married me and then decided to do something about his status. I think this will go against him because the BHC in Pakistan is asking him to bring any correspondance he has had with the Home Office. I think they are going to go down the route of rejecting him because he never tried to make contact with the home office to find out what his options were, instead he just continued to live and work illegally in this country. I don't know if the fact that he came here when he was only 16 would count in his favour, but has had 6 years to do something about his status so the ECO could use this at the interview.

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England
United Kingdom

Post by John » Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:02 pm

rainbow24, can you just clarify this ... the application form VAF2 ... was it completed truthfully and accurately .. or alternatively ... and sorry to ask this, but it is important ... was an attempt made to hide any relevant facts ... such as the 6 years in the UK?
John

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:36 pm

John, don't be sorry, fire away with any question you like!
rainbow24, can you just clarify this ... the application form VAF2 ... was it completed truthfully and accurately .. or alternatively ... and sorry to ask this, but it is important ... was an attempt made to hide any relevant facts ... such as the 6 years in the UK?
Yes, the applicaiton was completed truthfully and accuately. He stated in the application that he had been in the UK previously. He also told the Immigration Officers at the embarkment point at Heathrow Airport when he voluntarily left the country back in August 2006 that he had been in the UK illegally for 6 years. He was asked questions about his stay and had his finger prints taken.

He has also told Immigration at Islamabad Airport that he was living in the UK illegally and the duration he stayed. So he has not lied at all.

Although what's worrying me at the moment is that he has received a letter about the interview at the BHC on Tuesday. In the letter they are asking for the following infomration as stated in one of my previous messages:

1) Any passports that he has ever held in the UK
2) Any letters that he has ever sent or received from the home office.

Well, again as I mentioned before, he came with an agent just after his 17th birthday, he is now 23. The agent had the passport in his hand the whole time, my husband did not see it. When he said goodbye to the agent at Heathrow, the agent took the passport with him and he never seen him again. He doesn't have any contact details for him.

As for the home office letter - this is what worries me. I think they are giving him the chance to provide evidence that he TRIED to approach the home office to sort out his status whilst living in the UK. If he does not provide such evidence, I am worried they will refuse him saying that you only "Did something about it when you got married to British Citizen and have lived and worked illegally for the last 6 years"

John, what should he do and should he say that he worked here illegally?

Jeff Albright
Senior Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:25 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Post by Jeff Albright » Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:26 am

rainbow24 wrote:Jeff, what you said in your last message took my by surprise. We were told by a solicitor that if my husband continued to live and work in this country and was caught by immigration, he would be deported and would not be allowed to re enter for 3 years.
Unless it was prior to October 2000, this is sheer rubbish! You do not have to ask a solicitor - just simple reading in the Internet will give you sufficient understanding of this.
I have heard that if an illegal immigrant stays in this country for 8 years he can apply for permanency.
It is plainly incorrect. The number of years someone spends here for whatever reason does not give right to permanent residence unless accompanied by other special factors "truly exceptional circumstances". There are cases where people have been here for 13-15 years but the Home Office were still pursuing appeals against the Tribunal's determinations previously allowing those appeals.
I am not sure if this is correct or not, but my husband was desperate to get his status sorted out straight away and so was I because we were living in fear that he would get caught at work and at the same time he couldn't give up his job and lie low for 2 years because we needed the money.
This does not appear to be the case from what you have said. You said that he has been here for 6 years and never even approached the Home Office in attempt to have his status regularised. This however, will not harm his application for entry clearance as a spouse.
Which makes me think, why the heck did he go back to Pakistan in the first place. Why not just continue to work until he gets caught because they won't deport illegal immigrants unless they have a criminal record and are a danger to the public.
It is unlikely he would have been caught unless someone had tipped him off. What he did was right - at least he will now get his passport, proper visa, pave his way to citizenship and you will be able to live normal life, travel and have freedoms like everyone else.
How would BHC in Islamabad know if he left the country volunatily or if he was caught, because he would still be issued with the same letter?
That IS151A is of no more consequence once he has left. Once he has crossed the border, everything starts all over again. The ECO will certainly look into his immigration history but that will be primarily to establish who he is, who you are, your relationship and all the details to be satisfied that you are going to live together as husband and wife.
This seems like a good idea, however I think we are too late now as the interview is on Tuesday. I have a full time job and have provided bank statements and 20 payslips including my P60. I am living in shared accomodation paying £250 per month which includes a large double bedroom and a box room for my baby and includes ALL bills and I bring home £1074 a month after tax.
Well, your disposable income is around £800, which should be sufficient to support both of you. So this should satisfy the requirement.
We have also had measurements done of the house which has passed and a letter has been provided confirming that the house is not overcrowded and is fit for entry clearance. I just don't know if they would consider my salary too low to look after myself, hubby and the baby. My husbands friend who is also a manager at McDonalds has offered him a job if he comes to the UK, however it is too late to get hold of a letter which is a real pitty. I just pray that Islamabad don't make this into an issue.
I think the accommodation and maintenance requirements should be met. If you have provided the evidence that you intend to live together as husband and wife (evidence that you have already lived together for some time, such as utility bills, bank statements on both names, medical cards, any correspondence), he should be ok.

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England
United Kingdom

Post by John » Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:35 am

John, what should he do and should he say that he worked here illegally?
It is very important that he answers all questions truthfully. In other words, "get caught in the lie, wave the visa goodbye!".
John

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:40 pm

This does not appear to be the case from what you have said. You said that he has been here for 6 years and never even approached the Home Office in attempt to have his status regularised. This however, will not harm his application for entry clearance as a spouse.

Yes, he has been here for a total of 6 years. What I was trying to say was that I had heard that if he stayed for a total of 8 years he could apply for permanency. However, he did not want to stay a further 2 years in this country incase he was caught by immigration at work. It was too risky. But as you have just confirmed, what I have heard is incorrect. It doesn't matter how long he has been here, it doesn't give him the right to permanency. Thanks for clarifying the matter!

I hope you are right when you say that by not contacting the home office in an attempt to have his status regularised this should not affect his applicaiton for entry clearance as a spouse. I have a funny feeling they are going to use this against him because it shows he made no effort himself before he got married to put things right. It states in the inteview letter that they want to see evidence of contact with the home office. To me, that rings alarm bells.

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:42 pm

This does not appear to be the case from what you have said. You said that he has been here for 6 years and never even approached the Home Office in attempt to have his status regularised. This however, will not harm his application for entry clearance as a spouse.
Yes, he has been here for a total of 6 years. What I was trying to say was that I had heard that if he stayed for a total of 8 years he could apply for permanency. However, he did not want to stay a further 2 years in this country incase he was caught by immigration at work. It was too risky. But as you have just confirmed, what I have heard is incorrect. It doesn't matter how long he has been here, it doesn't give him the right to permanency. Thanks for clarifying the matter!

I hope you are right when you say that by not contacting the home office in an attempt to have his status regularised this should not affect his applicaiton for entry clearance as a spouse. I have a funny feeling they are going to use this against him because it shows he made no effort himself before he got married to put things right. It states in the inteview letter that they want to see evidence of contact with the home office. To me, that rings alarm bells

jes2jes
Senior Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:31 pm

Post by jes2jes » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:03 pm

Rainbow24:

I have been reading your post for the past couple of days (weeks?) and I must say I sympathise with you for the agony and emotions you are going through.

What I find it difficult to understand is your negativity of your spouses success in obtainingg his entry clearance. John, Jeff and another OP has told you clearly you would succeed if all documents required are submitted and the truth is relayed (well, he only has to provide information requested and not to volunteer anything not asked).

He cannot also provide documents he does not possess i.e. Home office letter and previous passports, so please stop worrying and rather be praying for him since your present state would not help but rather make matters worst for yourself. Why don't you believe that, He has done the right thing to regularise his status and his EC would be granted?

Take a look at the following you have posted so far:
I have a funny feeling they are going to use this against him because it shows he made no effort himself before he got married to put things right.
Bad isn't it?
If my husbands visa was rejected, wouldn't we have heard before now?
Not good, be positive?
Your Visa Application/Passport has been processed and has been received at the Gerry Fedex office, please come and collect it bringing with you your National Identity Card and your original recepit.

Does this mean that a decision has been made?
Does it suggest that he has his visa?
Could he still be asked to attend an interview?
Could a rejection letter be sitting in the office along with his application, or do the embassies send a rejection letter out in advance to the applicants address if their case is rejected?
Do you remember the above too?
I am in desperate need of help here. I do apologise for going on and on...but I am concerned for my baby who is right now without his daddy and god forbid might never get the chance to see him.
You are worrying too much about something which has not happened. If the worst happens, thank God you have the means of travelling to Pakistan to visit or stay there until a visa is sorted!! :roll:
I think they are going to go down the route of rejecting him because he never tried to make contact with the home office to find out what his options were, instead he just continued to live and work illegally in this country
I cannot believe you said this! Oh no! :oops:
If he does not provide such evidence, I am worried they will refuse him saying that you only "Did something about it when you got married to British Citizen and have lived and worked illegally for the last 6 years"
What a shame!

My advise to you is just to relax till tomorrow and turn your anxiety and worry into prayers for him rather and wait until the decision from the ECO which I believe would be favourable. Your baby will definitely see His/her daddy.

All the best and stay positive. :D
Praise The Lord!!!!

rainbow24
Junior Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:57 pm

Post by rainbow24 » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:57 pm

jes2jes,

Thankyou for your message which actually made me laugh! I needed some cheering up, and when I read all your quotes, I realised just how negative I have been over the last week. :oops:


jes2jes I have approached various solicitors for advice and at least 2 of them told me that just because he has a baby in this country, it doesn't give him the automatic right to come to the UK. Solicitors have also told us, much to our dismay, that even though our case fits the criteria of a spouse visa, his bad immigration history overides everything and he would be "very lucky" if he ever comes back to the UK. No-one, apart from people on this forum, has actually given us words of encouragement or advised us that we have a good chance of being reunited again. So now can you see where I am coming from?

Don't get me wrong, I have faith in my husband, I just don't have faith in the Immigration system. I have heard about so many cases that have been submitted to Islamabad and the ECO's have grilled so many people and rejected so many cases. Many of them have gone to an appeal stage, and the judges have admitted that "Islamabad don't know what they are talking about and are rejecting visas for stupid reasons". That's why I am scared. I am not going to go on and on about it because I am probably boring you all to tears, but I just hope for the sake of my son, he will be reunited with his father. :cry:

Jeff Albright
Senior Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 10:25 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Post by Jeff Albright » Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:00 pm

Rainbow,

Just remember one thing - there is the law behind any refusal/approval. The visa cannot be refused for no reason - there must be clear lawful grounds for refusal. The ECO has no power to refuse his visa because your husband has previously been here unlawfully, because he never approached the Home Office, because he was given the IS151A or because they just disliked your husband for any reason. Any such refusal is appealable directly to the AIT, as unlawful decision and WILL be thrown out.

You have to work your mind ensuring that ALL the rules are FULLY met when applying under this category. Read the rules for spouse visa requirements (I am sure you have already done so) and act accordingly. Don't let emotions sweep you off your feet.
We are waiting for some good news from you. Cheer up!

Locked