ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Refused due to third party bank letter from USA

Only for UK Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) points system. This route is now closed to new applicants.

Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha

Locked
Dhirasrom78
Newly Registered
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 10:08 pm
Location: Wolverhampton

Refused due to third party bank letter from USA

Post by Dhirasrom78 » Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:33 pm

PSW Route 50K 3rd party fund from USA

Applied: 02 November 2013
Biometric Letter: 07 November 2013
Acknowledgement letter: 09 November 2013
Biometric enrolled: 26 November 2013
Refusal letter: dated 03 December 2013 and received 6 November 2013

Reasons for refused:
A. In exact wording "No letter from the financial institution in which XYZ`s (3RD PARTY`s NAME) funds are held has been supplied to establish that those funds are accessible to your business, as specified under Paragraph 41-SD(c)(i) of Appendix A of immigration rules."

Though HO acknowledged that I have supplied following docs:

1) JPMorgan Chase bank NA summary with closing balance of £50K+ and customer summary of XYX (3rd Party), where all details of customer shown
2. 3rd Party declaration with notary public (as HO prescribed sample)
3. Attorney-at-Law (Legal Representative) letter that confirmed 3rd party`s declaration and signature are valid and true (as HO prescribed sample)

Please note that 3rd party is a US citizen and is my brother-in-law failed to pursue JPMorgan Chase bank NA local branch manager to write any letter that contain money is ready to invest in the UK and/or money is disposable to the UK and/or above bank regulated by US Federal Reserve (Home regulator).

I argued in covering letter that apart from customer details and bank balance details with closing balance, it is their policy not to write any customise letter on request of customer. Also provided PRA website that shows JPMorgan Chase bank NA have banking presence in the UK, regulated by PRA. Because they HO did not award 25 point for money, same reason didn’t consider 25 for money disposable the UK and regulated by home regulator.

B. I have been awarded 0 out of 10 in "maintenance fund", stated I have failed to provided consecutive 90 days though my statements from RBS covering from 05/08/2013 to 02/11/2013 which clearly 90 days. Please count it for me!! According to Calendar days its 90 days exactly !!

It also worth mention that I have started maintaining "maintenance fund" from 03/08/2013(Saturday), as 03/08/2013 was Saturday and no balance showing from Saturday (03/08/2013) and banking rule is that start showing from dated 05/08/2013(Monday) and clearly stated in the description that money has deposited on 03/08/13 and branch manager issued a letter those confirmed that weekend transaction rule shows following Monday.

I have right to appeal and want to challenge those decisions by HO.
Can anyone please advise what should I do?
Last edited by Dhirasrom78 on Sun Dec 08, 2013 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

Princess of Ammi
- thin ice -
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:33 pm

Post by Princess of Ammi » Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:10 pm

Bad news !!
thanks,

khan_81
Member of Standing
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:03 pm
United Kingdom

Post by khan_81 » Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:49 pm

Piece of advice APPEAL

Princess of Ammi
- thin ice -
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:33 pm

Post by Princess of Ammi » Sun Dec 08, 2013 2:35 pm

if you can not arrange or make your third party(that you should) to transfer money into your account before the visa(now before the appeal hearing) you should have to be involved in expending your business in terms of providing services to an extended level. this would make you invest further money in addition to what you have already invested, is how you can prove that you are genuinely doing a business which is active in providing services, you have began to invest money, provide tribunal with the proof of investment.

besides above you should try and make your sponsor transferring money in your account. your third party would have to do it one day anyway so why not now when you actually need it.

regards,
thanks,

rayuk
Junior Member
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 11:17 am
United Kingdom

Post by rayuk » Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:17 pm

This is a harsh unjust decision which many of us utilising third party funding have received from the UKBA.
You will find more details here: http://www.immigrationboards.com/viewto ... 234#959234

Sonye
Junior Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:42 pm

Post by Sonye » Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:37 pm

@princess of ammi
I just heard today that they have a new rule that you cannot provide any more proof to the tribunal outside the documents you provided for your application. My friend had his hearing a fee weeks ago and was refused any further documents.

Locked