CULLINAN wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:25 pm
The attachments are if you were to run a dummy application as a dependent in a single account.
However, you did it right also as you added yourself as a partner and kids as Child below 18 or 18+ accordingly as per your situation. I am assuming this is how the layout of the form is i.e. not to ask the category individually after selecting the “relationship” at the “adding an applicant” stage.
I do not have the sight to your form as I can only reach to the “add another applicant” stage after filling the main applicant’s form first.
So my question is:
May I know, if it asked about your wife’s details (as the sponsor) for yourself and kids individually in your own forms?
Dear Cullinan,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
First of all, i want to clarify some of the doubts you may have on the actually Set (O):
1.After "add another applicant" for myself, the form ask me "What is your relationship to the main applicant? and my answer is Spouse " and when I "add another applicant" for my 2 kids, i filled up the relationship as "son" accordingly.....
2.For each dependant, the form asked for date of birth, but never ask whether my kids are below 18 or 18+ (Note: both my kid turned full 18 year old in April 2002)
3.I expect the form dependant section will ask for liuk and English test for my 2 kids, but to my surprise, it does not ask for all these information. I am thinking may be HO looks at Year you are born. My 2 kids born in 4/2002 and as of now, counting the months, they are already 18+. If you look at Year 2002, they are 18 and below, so they dont need any liuk and English test. Please confirm i am correct, otherwise, i think i am filling up the wrong form.
4.However. the form did ask me for my liuk and English proficiency details.
5.it did not ask about my wife’s details (as the sponsor) for myself and kids individually in our own forms.
6. Do you think, I need to change the category for my wife to "Tier 1 or Appendix W dependants" ?? so that I will get the results you expected.
It looks like some of the experience of filling up Set(O) is inconsistent with what you have expected. I am worried now.
Look forward to hearing from you.
Kind regards
Ben