- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Just of out interest, is there a rule governing this?Directive/2004/38/EC wrote:How long did it take for your EEA FP to be issued after you received the body of your successful appeal against an initial refusal?
6 days? 6 months? More?
Unfortunately, "as soon as possible" is undefined.12 wrote:(4) An EEA family permit issued under this regulation shall be issued free of charge and as soon as possible.
So this applies only to EU law applications, and presumably expires if the HO appeals and wins?Rolfus wrote:One important point is that once you have the written determination, you have proof of the existence of directly effective treaty rights, so you should be admitted if you turn up at a port. (Eurostar in Paris might be most practical). This is so even if HO have appealed.
40 The ECO's whole line of argument is based on the premise that it would be a breach of immigration rules for the Appellant to undertake work experience. This fails to consider the possibility that she already has an EU right that allows her to work in the UK. As has been discussed, there has been a successful appeal against refusal of a FP (Warsaw/xxxxx). In the determination it is established that the Appellant has derivative treaty rights entitling her to work in the UK. She is waiting for these rights to be attested to by an EEA Family Permit. That she has satisfied the factual conditions of this EU right has been established.
41 The direct effectivity of an EU right is described in M (Chen parents: source of rights) Ivory Coast [2010] UKUT 277 (IAC) (10 August 2010):
"40. Whereas in W China the conditions for the existence of the right were not made out, on the IJ's findings in the present case they were. Accordingly it is apparent as a matter of law that having satisfied the factual conditions for its existence M enjoys a derivative right of entry to make C's right of entry effective. This is a right given by EU law. It is a directly effective right, that exists independently of the terms of the EEA Regulations and the Immigration Rules that in any event must be interpreted compatibly with EU law where it is possible to do so."
42 The position of the Appellant is exactly analogous. A judge has established that the factual conditions exist. Her right to work in the UK is directly effective under EU, and therefore British, law, irrespective of whether or not it has been attested to by an EEA Family Permit.
I am not sure how long they have to decide to appeal the tribunal's decision. But presumably it is not longer than the 30 days you had to appeal.astra_zeneca888 wrote:Following an earlier request in this thread, I would like to post the following info regarding the issue of a FP after successful appeal:
1. My mother submitted an application for a FP in June 2011. Application was refused. An appeal was submitted in Aug 2011.
2. The hearing took place on the 1st Feb 2012. Appeal was allowed.
3. My mother received the Tribunal's written determination on the 1st March 2012.
We have been waiting since that time for someone to contact us from the Embassy in MD where the application was submitted. Unfortunately, the case was dealt with by someone in British Embassy in Warsaw and this makes things more complicated...
We have made several attempts to contact the embassy in MD to ask when the FP can be issued. Have been told to wait for a letter from embassy in Warsaw! My understanding is that the embassy in MD is awaiting for updates on the case from the office in Warsaw..
Have emailed both embassies to ask when the requested FP can be issued following a successful appeal. So far, no replies!
So we have been waiting in total for 13 weeks now since we have received the written determination! How much longer?!
Also, what would a reasonable waiting time be before a FP can be issued? And what else can we do to speed up the process bearing in mind that this application was lodged nearly a year ago!
Any comments/suggestions would be much appreciated.
Thank you.
astra_zeneca888 wrote:Forgot to mention that we have actually emailed the Tribunal Service to confirm if the Respondent (HO) has appealed the decision, and they have confirmed to us that the HO did not appeal, they had 28 days to appeal.
Visas and entry clearance wrote:The UK Border Agency has 5 days in which to challenge the determination. If they decide not to do so they will send a copy of the determination to the Entry Clearance Officer and aim to do this within 4 weeks.
Good question. Brainstorming time.astra_zeneca888 wrote:Yes, I had to pay a solicitor fee of GBP450 to submit the appeal on our behalf. No one has mentioned any possibility of a refund. I did not even think that this was possible! How do I do that??
Directive/2004/38/ECYes, I had to pay a solicitor fee of GBP450 to submit the appeal on our behalf. No one has mentioned any possibility of a refund. I did not even think that this was possible! How do I do that?
oral hearing cost 140 GBP without any lawyer fee, average lawyer cost atleast 500 GBP for this purpose.How much of the 450 was the fee to submit the appeal?
you can expect to get a reply from visa post after 3 months time, if earlier then you are luckyThis confirmation was received on the 26th March.
The EU commission considers delays of more than three weeks to be unreasonable.astra_zeneca888 wrote:
Also, what would a reasonable waiting time be before a FP can be issued?