- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
There is no basis in law for the ECO's decision.donald_f wrote: Can some please give a second opinion from the legal point about my chances of receiving a decision in my favor?
Reg 6 is not necessarily relevant to reg 12.donald_f wrote: • Regulation 6 of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 requires you to show that your sponsor is a "qualified person". The onus is on you and your sponsor to show that she is a jobseeker or has employment in the UK.
Irrelevant, but why was this application refused?donald_f wrote: • I note that you previously applied under the same category; that application was refused on 19/6/2012
Not required and so what. Irrelevant.donald_f wrote: • "You have provided no evidence that your sponsor is searching for work, or any evidence of her ability to do so. In your application form you state that you are searching for work, and the job adverts you have supplied are for you.
I concur, but the basis for the overall rejection is nonsense.donald_f wrote: • It is not relevant to your application whether or not you are or have been seeking employment in the UK.
It is for the EU national to enjoy their rights of free movement and not for the ECO to judge what the overall intentions are. Three months - no restrictions - NONE.donald_f wrote: • Your sponsor has qualifications in chemistry, and I note there are various printouts from job websites in this field. I also note that the accommodation evidence indicates that you intend to stay in London; however there the various print outs from job websites cover the following areas in the UK: Runcorn; Oxfordshire; the North East; Harrogate; Cambridgeshire; the West Midlands; Lincolnshire; Gloucestershire; East Sussex; Derbyshire; Dartford; and Flitwick. It is reasonable to expect a person seeking employment in the UK to have a reasonable idea of where they intend to settle and live; the spread of locations of these jobs are indicative of someone simply printing off job advertisements to lodge with your application; there is no evidence whatsoever that your sponsor has actually applied for any of the employment positions in the UK. It is reasonable to expect your sponsor to show that she is genuinely a job seeker or has gained employment in the UK; this would include acknowledgement that she has applied for employment; there is no such documentation o show this.
The ECO person simply does not understand the regulations.donald_f wrote:I
• Taking into account your circumstances, based on the information and documentation that you have provided and considering your application as a whole, I am not satisfied that you have adequately demonstrated that your sponsor is exercising his Treaty rights and therefore that you meet the requirements for non-EEA national spouse of an EEA National applying for an EEA Family Permit
I doubt that Article 8 has not been taken into account, this is simply lip service.donald_f wrote: • I have also taken account of article 8 of the Human Rights Act. I consider that refusing this application is justified and proportionate in the exercise of the immigration control. I do not believe that refusing this application will interfere with family life, for the purposes of article 8 (1), as you can continue to enjoy that in India.
donald_f wrote: • I also note that you have failed to provide a copy of your sponsor's Home Office registration. This is a requirement under EEA regulations and following such registration your sponsor would be given an EEA residence permit card for the UK. There is no evidence to show that your sponsor is in the UK and/or is genuinely actively seeking employment.
Were both of the refusals for exactly the same reason? The applications were done together?donald_f wrote:I have received 2 refusals for EEA family permit from the UKBA for myself and my son.
As per my solicitor’s advice this time there are very good grounds for appeal against this decision by the ECO.
I am not sure what you are saying here.Lucapooka wrote:If your partner is in India rather than inside the UK, she does [NOT?] need to be a qualified person exercising treaty rights for the first 3 months from her arrival in the UK.
Me and my son are Indian national. my wife was an Indian national, but has now taken Portuguese nationality (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese ... ty_law#Goa)EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:What nationality do you hold?
First RefusalDirective/2004/38/EC wrote:Wow!
Were both of the refusals for exactly the same reason? The applications were done together?donald_f wrote:I have received 2 refusals for EEA family permit from the UKBA for myself and my son.
As per my solicitor’s advice this time there are very good grounds for appeal against this decision by the ECO.
Where is your solicitor? At what stage is the appeal? When did you want to move to the UK?
Great, so there are no special restrictions on you enjoying your freedom of movement, these expired for Portuguese nationals in 1992.donald_f wrote:Me and my son are Indian national. my wife was an Indian national, but has now taken Portuguese nationality (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese ... ty_law#Goa)EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:What nationality do you hold?
Bear in mind that an appeal could take some time. You can appeal and complain simultaneously.donald_f wrote:First RefusalDirective/2004/38/EC wrote:Wow!
Were both of the refusals for exactly the same reason? The applications were done together?donald_f wrote:I have received 2 refusals for EEA family permit from the UKBA for myself and my son.
As per my solicitor’s advice this time there are very good grounds for appeal against this decision by the ECO.
Where is your solicitor? At what stage is the appeal? When did you want to move to the UK?
"You have provided no evidence that your sponsor is searching for work, or any evidence of her ability to do so. In your application form you state that you are searching for work, and the job adverts you have supplied are for you."
Also they had mentioned that there are reason to believe my sponsor is not a qualified person.
Both our applications were to gather.
My solicitor in based in India. I am yet to file an appeal.
They are UK Immigration specialist Law firm providing Visa application and advisory services particularly in Entry Clearance Applications, Administrative review and Appeal, also a Lawyer in India and Solicitor for England and Wales.Directive/2004/38/EC wrote:Does your Indian based lawyer know much about EU free movement law?
Till date she has not been outside of India. She was born and is still living in India with us. Her Portuguese nationality papers were also processed at the Portuguese consulate (Goa) and some in Lisbon.Jambo wrote:Just to clarify - Was your wife living in India during all the previous applications? Did she at any point move to the UK alone?
That is what I'm saying and thanks for correcting the typo.Directive/2004/38/EC wrote:I am not sure what you are saying here.Lucapooka wrote:If your partner is in India rather than inside the UK, she does [NOT?] need to be a qualified person exercising treaty rights for the first 3 months from her arrival in the UK.
In that case, the reasons for refusal are completely rubbish.donald_f wrote:Till date she has not been outside of India. She was born and is still living in India with us. Her Portuguese nationality papers were also processed at the Portuguese consulate (Goa) and some in Lisbon.