- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Getting to the border is not hard if you are travelling within Europe so that will not be an issue. I assume if someone has an EEA FP (recently expired) and travelling to UK with there UK family member they have already demonstrated they qualify; as we all know how creative UKBA can get while refusing the EEA FP.EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:In general a visa national will have a hard time getting to a border. If one gets to a border, it is possible to enter if one can demonstrate that one qualifies.
Make your life easy, get the residence card sorted out or at least allow enough time abroad to get another family permit.
If you say even yourself that it is the best thing to do, then do it!newbieholland wrote:I know the best thing to do is apply for an RC but that means my work getting affected.
If I request my passport back would it come back with the COA?fysicus wrote:If you say even yourself that it is the best thing to do, then do it!newbieholland wrote:I know the best thing to do is apply for an RC but that means my work getting affected.
I have no idea why your work should be affected. You can ask your passport back pretty soon after the application has been submitted, without affecting the application or its outcome.
Hey dude... You are saying you don't see why does it matter because you are not reading my post properly before commenting. Obviously the whole issue is related to be able to travel in and out of UK without issues. I guess the COA should allow me to re enter UK without any issues. I have lived in two other member states and gone through the process of applying for an RC twice now. The preliminary visa (6 months)is issued pretty much on the same day while they assess your application. UKBA already checks your eligibility before issuing the EEA FP so why do they hold the passport and the COA to waste people's time.fysicus wrote:This question is impossible to answer, and I also don't see why it matters. Getting the CoA and getting your passport back are two totally unrelated events.
Anyway, unless you really need your passport back immediately, better wait until you already have the CoA to request it back.
I dont really think you understand my situation to be honest. So I really dont mind if you do not help me as you are not adding any information here which I don`t already know. If I apply now and ask them to return my passport without getting a COA then there is no need for the application to be sent in rush to risk my travel plan.fysicus wrote: I understand your situation better than you apparently can imagine.
When did I mention that I have a query regarding ascertaining my rights? I have no issues working here on an expired EEA FP at all as my employer does understand my rights.fysicus wrote:Before you can even consider to travel for work, first of all you have to secure your right to work.
As I said earlier you are not reading my post at all and just giving me the generic information that you know about EEA FP. I got my Entry clearance on Surinder Singh ruling which means we have already proved the UKBA that my EU family member is a qualified person to be in the UK on EEA rulings. The UK national does not have to meet any additional conditions to be a qualified person upon their return to the UK after an employment in another member state.fysicus wrote:Although strictly speaking this is an automatic right, you cannot expect third parties to verify again and again that your EU family member is actually exercising treaty rights in the UK.
Every person asking for information on this forum does not necessarily be as desperate as you think they are. Please do not have a go at me for calling you a dude (which was a friendly gesture) unless you are a lady.fysicus wrote:Don't call me dude, if you want me to help you, please.
Well, good for you that your employer does understand your rights, but I think he does not understand his own obligations.newbieholland wrote:I have no issues working here on an expired EEA FP at all as my employer does understand my rights.
Isn't the obligation to check before employment starts and every 12 months? The HO recommends to check close to the expiry date if within 12 months but as long as the employer can show he followed the 3 steps before employment started, he should be covered for 12 months.fysicus wrote: Well, good for you that your employer does understand your rights, but I think he does not understand his own obligations.
The probability of it happening may be small, but if his business is honoured with an inspection by UKBA he may face at least tough questions, and if fined he will have no defence he can use to appeal.
UKBA`s site clearly states the following at this Link http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/eucit ... ts-family/fysicus wrote:Well, good for you that your employer does understand your rights, but I think he does not understand his own obligations.newbieholland wrote:I have no issues working here on an expired EEA FP at all as my employer does understand my rights.
The probability of it happening may be small, but if his business is honoured with an inspection by UKBA he may face at least tough questions, and if fined he will have no defence he can use to appeal.
Thanks for the link Jambo there is a slight difference between Mel C and my case as I do have an expired EEA FP which clarifies UKBA has verified my claims (over two applications and about 16 + weeks wait) for Surinder Singh rather than giving me the stamp in 10 mins.Jambo wrote:Sorry to interrupt this lovely discussion but you might find the following interesting - MelC - Surninder Singh @ Calais.
Yes, that is true in itself.EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:My understanding is that an employer can be fined if he employed a person who was not entitled to work AND did not conduct any checks.
What makes you say that I do not want to? Are you a psychic? I have no clue as to why are you assuming things about me and making statements on my behalf? I am just weighing my options here.fysicus wrote: newbieholland for some reason does not want to get this confirmation from UKBA, and seems to think it is reasonable to require from any third party to verify his rights (when he wants to exercise them) from scratch over and over again.
newbieholland wrote:What makes you say that I do not want to? Are you a psychic? I have no clue as to why are you assuming things about me and making statements on my behalf? I am just weighing my options here.fysicus wrote: newbieholland for some reason does not want to get this confirmation from UKBA, and seems to think it is reasonable to require from any third party to verify his rights (when he wants to exercise them) from scratch over and over again.
I hope your questions have answered to your satisfaction. I feel that things have gone a little off-topic and it is better that we move on.newbieholland wrote:...