- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Hi, the other topic that you started has been locked by the moderators. So I'm replying to your post here.DangerousWolf wrote:This is different situation. Third party funds means you are showing funds under someone else account.
If your uncle has transferred funds to your account then no more declaration required.
That's where the contradiction lies. You are allowed to have a third party in the UK but then at the same time, they are saying that you cannot have money in a third party's name if the funds are in the uk.DangerousWolf wrote:If you are saying you got all money in UK bank account transferred from yours uncle's - then there is no concept of third party applicable for you. UKBA doesn't care from where you are bringing in the money.
Third party concept applicable only when you do not have money under your named bank account. You would have required declaration from your Uncle only if the money is in his account and you want to show it for yourself.
Hope it make sense.
My query was, whether 3rd party concept is applicable when you want to show money within UK or it is limited for international funds.
Okay, so I can just show my own bank statements as my uncle has already transferred money into my UK, and that will all I need?DangerousWolf wrote:Sorry Lucapooka.. I didn't read your comments under this topic and asked the same sort of things under another thread.
Guys, what Lucapooka is saying make sense to me.
Access to £50,000 -
1) If you have money in your UK bank account - can show bank statement.
2) If you know someone, who's got the money in UK bank account - Then Bank letter, declaration and sign verification will be required.
3) If you have money in overseas bank account or if you know anyone who's got money in overseas bank account - then again Bank letter, declaration and sign verification will be required.
All the above 3 routes can be added together in case to show prove £50,000 access.
No, that's not what was discussed. Bank statements from overseas in any circumstances, even when the money is held by the applicant, are not accepted. In such cases a letter from the FI is necessary. Only bank statements from the UK meet the requirements without the need for a letter and you only need one or the other rather than both. Please read para 98 of the guidance.rajm2012 wrote:So regardless of the country you are showing the money in, bank statements will NOT be accepted as evidence of funds if you are showing third party funding?? ?
I'm sorry but I don't seem to understand what you're trying to say. Please read my quote again. I wrote regardless of the country you are showing money in, bank statements are not accepted as evidence of funds if you are showing third party funding. You confirmed a part of it by saying bank statements from overseas in any circumstances are not accepted, even if it is held by the applicant. Now comes the showing money in the UK part. If you have money in the UK, bank statements are only accepted as evidence if the money is in your own name. Am I correct? Bank statements won't be accepted as evidence of funds if the money is in third party's name in the UK, right? So if you're showing money in third party's name in the UK, you will need to get a bank letter. Please correct me if I'm wrong.Lucapooka wrote:No, that's not what was discussed. Bank statements from overseas in any circumstances, even when the money is held by the applicant, are not accepted. In such cases a letter from the FI is necessary. Only bank statements from the UK meet the requirements without the need for a letter and you only need one or the other rather than both. Please read para 98 of the guidance.rajm2012 wrote:So regardless of the country you are showing the money in, bank statements will NOT be accepted as evidence of funds if you are showing third party funding?? ?
Its clearly mentioned in the policy guidance that for initial applications, you need to be registered as a director within 3 months from the date of application. So in your case, you won't be able to apply with the company that you have been a director as its more than 3 months.Gorgeous_Worrier wrote:Dear Friends,
I am applying for initial application. Since last 7 months, I am director of my existing company. I am bit confused regarding following para. in Guidance Policy;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"112. If you were a director of a new or existing company you must provide the following:
Current Appointment Report from Companies House: This will list the Directors of a company and
the dates of their appointment. Even if you are no longer a Director of the same company, we
require the Current Appointment Report for the date that you became a Director of that company.
If the date on the Current Appointment Report was more than 8 months after your specified date
we will not award any points for this section."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here, I am not sure this Para is applicable to me for initial application. If it is for initial application, than I am bit worried about Sentence in Bold. when I submit my application I would finish 9 months duration of director of my company.
I would Like to request senior members to Clarify my doubts.
Thanks in Advance!