- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
I think this kind of refusal does not carry 10 years direct ban. Its comes with 1 year direct ban and 2, 5, 10 years indirect ban with some conditions.gj6ab5657 wrote: he got refusal under para.322(1A), of the immigration Rules. with future application 10 years banned
Thanks Deviser for the prompt reply ,Deviser wrote:I think this kind of refusal does not carry 10 years direct ban. Its comes with 1 year direct ban and 2, 5, 10 years indirect ban with some conditions.gj6ab5657 wrote: he got refusal under para.322(1A), of the immigration Rules. with future application 10 years banned
Anyhow, did he mentioned in application form that he is using any agent's services? Did he speak to the college and why did your friend do not visit the college to confirm when he got CAS from agent? Did he attend classes? If yes, than how can he do that on false CAS/enrollement, and, if he did not attend the classes how can he prove he is a genuine student?
Most of solicitor just want money. Now a days, they are just ripping-off student who are in same situation. I know a student who paid £8000 to solicitors and now going home with ban.
Whatever the agent said, how any student can believe that he do not need to attend classes even he paid for that course? Its clearly shows that he was just trying to prolong his visa and was not intended for study.gj6ab5657 wrote:he hasn't attended class because agent was keep saying to him you no need to go attend class until your visa come back with stamp from UKBA
Than what police said? Did they arrested that agent or raid on his office or home? Did you sent any information to UKBA about that?gj6ab5657 wrote:he was completely mis-guided by agent and that's matter been reported in his police complain/fraud investigation team
You can try but I am hopeless. The case has many flaws in student point of view.gj6ab5657 wrote:how about chances to win appeal to First-tier Tribunal in this case?
That's right Deviser I'm completely agree with you and even my shelf blame to my friend because he should not trust anybody for anonymous/unknown agent and even he is not been registered with ''The Law Society''Deviser wrote:Whatever the agent said, how any student can believe that he do not need to attend classes even he paid for that course? Its clearly shows that he was just trying to prolong his visa and was not intended for study.gj6ab5657 wrote:he hasn't attended class because agent was keep saying to him you no need to go attend class until your visa come back with stamp from UKBA
Than what police said? Did they arrested that agent or raid on his office or home? Did you sent any information to UKBA about that?gj6ab5657 wrote:he was completely mis-guided by agent and that's matter been reported in his police complain/fraud investigation team
You can try but I am hopeless. The case has many flaws in student point of view.gj6ab5657 wrote:how about chances to win appeal to First-tier Tribunal in this case?
The circumstances of the case are clear. May be student was misguided by agent, but student himself was not intended to be wise. He try to prolong his stay by 'anyway' and when refused, now trying to blame some agent.
The only thing which may help you is police investigation report (in your favour) + solicitor efforts, but in this case, their is a risk of some thousands of sterlings.
just updates:about above case- student has appealed his matter through Solicitor and got the appeal date next Tuesday 27/11/12 let see what happens in the court hearing will update after court decision.gj6ab5657 wrote:That's right Deviser I'm completely agree with you and even my shelf blame to my friend because he should not trust anybody for anonymous/unknown agent and even he is not been registered with ''The Law Society''Deviser wrote:Whatever the agent said, how any student can believe that he do not need to attend classes even he paid for that course? Its clearly shows that he was just trying to prolong his visa and was not intended for study.gj6ab5657 wrote:he hasn't attended class because agent was keep saying to him you no need to go attend class until your visa come back with stamp from UKBA
Than what police said? Did they arrested that agent or raid on his office or home? Did you sent any information to UKBA about that?gj6ab5657 wrote:he was completely mis-guided by agent and that's matter been reported in his police complain/fraud investigation team
You can try but I am hopeless. The case has many flaws in student point of view.gj6ab5657 wrote:how about chances to win appeal to First-tier Tribunal in this case?
The circumstances of the case are clear. May be student was misguided by agent, but student himself was not intended to be wise. He try to prolong his stay by 'anyway' and when refused, now trying to blame some agent.
The only thing which may help you is police investigation report (in your favour) + solicitor efforts, but in this case, their is a risk of some thousands of sterlings.
just for kind your knowledge police has taken all details from my friend but not hear from any thing about any progress or seems arrested any body let's see what happens further I'll post when any updates - Thanks for taking time for this reply
I would agree with this.I think this kind of refusal does not carry 10 years direct ban. Its comes with 1 year direct ban and 2, 5, 10 years indirect ban with some conditions.
What he probably did was ... got CAS letter and filled the form himself.farhan984 wrote:1. Student should get admission in a University at their campus and not through an agent unless agent is an authorized one.
2. Case is weak if the student had not filled Representative section in Tier 4 application form.
Complaining about college or uni would still not help him. He can go back and apply again, if they have not banned him.k77 wrote:What kind of agent he was by telling your friend not to go to college.If you miss 10 contacts with the college, it is their legal duty to report that student to home office.
The case is very weak ,if he has not filled the representative section of the form.If the agent is registered with college or uni atleast your friend should complain to that college or uni about him for providing such a bad service on their behalf.
Thank you esic_sonia,k77,farhan984 and askhanesic_sonia wrote:Complaining about college or uni would still not help him. He can go back and apply again, if they have not banned him.k77 wrote:What kind of agent he was by telling your friend not to go to college.If you miss 10 contacts with the college, it is their legal duty to report that student to home office.
The case is very weak ,if he has not filled the representative section of the form.If the agent is registered with college or uni at least your friend should complain to that college or uni about him for providing such a bad service on their behalf.
Is there any ones opinion? please let us knowgj6ab5657 wrote:Hi! to every one,
just upgrade some more details above case but don't know whats this mean> student has appeal to upper tribunal against decision from First tier tribunal and upper tribunal has given decision as below:
*The decision of First-tier tribunal does contain an error of law and the decision in respect of the appeal against removal is set aside.
*The matter is re-made as follows:''the appeal against a refusal to vary leave is dismissed. The appeal against the s47 removal decision is not in accordance with the law and appeal is allowed to that extent''
what's does this mean? does he have to re apply for appeal in the First-tier tribunal? or can he re-apply for his visa?
your advice will be highly appreciated.
Thanks ''Greenie'' for your Determination now I got mean of what's the Upper Tribunal judgementGreenie wrote:If very simplistic terms it means as follows:
He lost the appeal in respect of being granted leave to remain under tier 4. If he wants to appeal this he would need to seek permission to appeal to the court of appeal. This is very difficult.
He won the appeal with respect to the decision to remove him from the UK (the section 47 decision). This is due to a technicality of ukba not properly legislating to make section 47removal decisions lawful. However this has now been rectified and the relevant legislation is now in force.
What is likely to happen, assuming no further appeals are successfully brought by either party is that either-
1) ukba will do nothing with the expectation that your friend will either make attempts to leave the UK voluntarily
Or
2)
They will make another decision to remove him from(possibly if 1) fails. This will attract another right of appeal.
No any reply from court of appeal yet.gj6ab5657 wrote:Hi! to all who knows all previous history in this case:
Once again little updates and curiosity about what happens next? or any ways applicant can stay in the UK legally?
first tier tribunal had refused to leave to remain in the UK but given permission to appeal to upper tribunal and Upper tribunal has suspended his leave and given permission to court of appeal, he has applied through solicitor to get permission to apply for court of appeal and been rejected again based on ''application is out of time'' but given another 14 days to re-submit application to court of appeal.
what percentage chances to win this appeal in the court of appeal - solicitors hoping will get positive response and if not than
does any one have any Idea about human rights ground UK born baby after how many years can parents apply for asylum?
or any example or similar case any one knows who got leave to remain in the UK?
any suggestion will be appreciated.