- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Agreed - but the OP shouldn't assume that the possession of a return ticket will make that much difference where someone clearly has so little incentive to return to their own country as has been indicated here.INSIDER wrote:A six month visit with no return ticket, no permanent employment and money issues. Unless she is lucky and gets to see an extremely laid back IO at the desk, she is almost certainly going to get refused.
anniecc wrote:I'm not sure why you want to apply for a visa for your gf when she can enter the UK without one. I think you might be making this unnecessarily complicated.
There's no reason why your gf should be refused entry at the border, provided she doesn't volunteer unnecessary information, such as the fact that she's unemployed or is coming to the UK to live with her boyfriend. I've entered the UK on several occasions as a visitor and was never asked anything at the border other than how long I was staying and what I was planning to do while here. I was never asked to show any documentation. The reason why the US and other countries have visa waiver status is that they are considered low risk from an immigration perspective. Your gf will only be asked difficult questions if she gives them reasons to be suspicious, so best to keep it as simple as possible and say she's here as a tourist and to visit friends. If that's not true, and she's actually coming to the UK with the intention to live with you permanently then she should be applying in a spouse/fiance category, not as a visitor. That's when your ability to sponsor her would come in.
Do you think it will be just as bad for getting a visa or do we stand a better chance with all the supporting documents about my finances etc? What kind of things would help?The key thing is she has to show she has an incentive to return to her home country. On the basis of what has been said she doesn't.
She has been given a bit of a hard time when she came over for 5 weeks. That makes me suspect that 6 months might be far worse. She can get quite nervous when confronted by people in positions of authority and tends to talk too much when she is nervous. The last thing we want is to plan the whole thing, buy tickets etc and then have her sent home...I'm not sure why you want to apply for a visa for your gf when she can enter the UK without one. I think you might be making this unnecessarily complicated.
There's no reason why your gf should be refused entry at the border, provided she doesn't volunteer unnecessary information, such as the fact that she's unemployed or is coming to the UK to live with her boyfriend.
She is coming to visit me, 6 months is not permanent by definition. As I understand it, you can sponsor a general visitor, not only family. We are not married and don't plan on getting married in the short term so family, spouse and fiance visas are not applicable.Your gf will only be asked difficult questions if she gives them reasons to be suspicious, so best to keep it as simple as possible and say she's here as a tourist and to visit friends. If that's not true, and she's actually coming to the UK with the intention to live with you permanently then she should be applying in a spouse/fiance category, not as a visitor. That's when your ability to sponsor her would come in.
Yes, you can sponsor a general visitor, I just haven't heard of anyone doing that for someone from a visa waiver country. More experienced members of this forum might be able to advise you. I understand your reasons for wanting to explore this option, but I think there's a risk it could backfire as it will draw additional attention to your girlfriend's case.As I understand it, you can sponsor a general visitor, not only family. We are not married and don't plan on getting married in the short term so family, spouse and fiance visas are not applicable.
Do you have any links to show that this is the case with the UK?INSIDER wrote:US nationals constitute one of the largest groups of denials of entry at my port together with Brazilians who are well known for overstaying and illegal working.
Nope I'm afraid I don't.ouflak1 wrote:Do you have any links to show that this is the case with the UK?INSIDER wrote:US nationals constitute one of the largest groups of denials of entry at my port together with Brazilians who are well known for overstaying and illegal working.
Also, do you have any links that describe why the UK government still allows Americans to be non-visa nationals given such a well documented risk as provided in your links to the question above?
Spot on in every respect. It was exactly the same when I worked at Terminal 3 20+ years ago.INSIDER wrote:Nope I'm afraid I don't.ouflak1 wrote:Do you have any links to show that this is the case with the UK?INSIDER wrote:US nationals constitute one of the largest groups of denials of entry at my port together with Brazilians who are well known for overstaying and illegal working.
Also, do you have any links that describe why the UK government still allows Americans to be non-visa nationals given such a well documented risk as provided in your links to the question above?
Its a perception I have from working at my port. I'm pretty sure I'm right though I admit to not keeping actual figures. Most are young Americans of both sexes who do no research about visiting the UK and assume because of historical ties and that they are US citizens it is perfectly fine to role up to the border ask to stay as long as legally possible and get the shock of their lives when we say no. Also a lot of these "visitors" are coming because they met someone on the internet. Often they are unemployed, have a one way ticket or have recently given up a job.
You can of course make an FOI request. If you do I'd be interested to know if my perception is correct.
Regarding why US nationals are visa-free, well it is a political decision, like all decisions as to why some nations are visa free and some aren't. Also, while US nationals are often refused at my port it has to be put in proper context. The number of refusals is still small compared to the number of US nationals who actually visit perfectly legitimately.
Can't say for sure but I doubt that she would get half as much potential grief entering Schengen. We go a couple of times a year with my Canadian wife and in four countries of entry (France/Spain/Switzerland/Bulgaria) she has never been asked a single question. Just a quick scan of her passport then a stamp.wiggsy wrote:a european visa might be worth investing in too if going to france too?
if you are concerned that uk might refuse entry, eu could too.
I was at a loose end the other night so made the FOI request in question just out of curiosity. Will let you know when I get a responseINSIDER wrote:Nope I'm afraid I don't.ouflak1 wrote:Do you have any links to show that this is the case with the UK?INSIDER wrote:US nationals constitute one of the largest groups of denials of entry at my port together with Brazilians who are well known for overstaying and illegal working.
Also, do you have any links that describe why the UK government still allows Americans to be non-visa nationals given such a well documented risk as provided in your links to the question above?
Its a perception I have from working at my port. I'm pretty sure I'm right though I admit to not keeping actual figures. Most are young Americans of both sexes who do no research about visiting the UK and assume because of historical ties and that they are US citizens it is perfectly fine to role up to the border ask to stay as long as legally possible and get the shock of their lives when we say no. Also a lot of these "visitors" are coming because they met someone on the internet. Often they are unemployed, have a one way ticket or have recently given up a job.
You can of course make an FOI request. If you do I'd be interested to know if my perception is correct.
Regarding why US nationals are visa-free, well it is a political decision, like all decisions as to why some nations are visa free and some aren't. Also, while US nationals are often refused at my port it has to be put in proper context. The number of refusals is still small compared to the number of US nationals who actually visit perfectly legitimately.