ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Confusing - FLR(M) refusal but granted?!

Family member & Ancestry immigration; don't post other immigration categories, please!
Marriage | Unmarried Partners | Fiancé | Ancestry

Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator

Locked
MoiMichMe
Newly Registered
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:49 pm
Location: Scotland

Confusing - FLR(M) refusal but granted?!

Post by MoiMichMe » Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:18 pm

Hi all,

I've been following the FLR(M) processing times thread silently for a while now, but I decided to register because today I received my documents, along with a very confusing cover letter. My 30-month BRP arrived yesterday and DH and I celebrated (we applied 4 August 2012 so believed it fell under the new rules), but now I'm wondering if the party was premature! Hopefully you wise people can offer some advice. Apologies for the very long first post! :)

Here is my UK timeline:

Sep 2005 - arrived from US on 1st student visa (MSc completed Aug 2006)
Dec 2006 - successful 2nd student visa (PhD completed Aug 2010)
Aug 2010 - successful Tier 1 PSW visa (expiring late Aug 2012)
Apr 2012 - got married to DH (UK citizen)
4 Aug 2012 - applied for FLR(M) by post
9 Aug 2012 - payment taken and Acknowledgment letter sent
Late Nov 2012 - Biometrics
25 Feb 2013 - BRP arrived, spouse/partner leave to remain valid until late Aug 2015, work permitted, no public funds
26 Feb 2013 - Docs arrived with 'refusal but granted' letter

So what's confusing to me in the letter from UKBA:

1. The app was considered under pre-July 9 rules [even though I applied in August and was on Points-based system when I applied, so we filled in everything for the post-July 9 rules...was that a mistake on our part, or more likely the caseworker's?]

2. My application 'did not meet the requirements as per the enclosed refusal notice.' [I've triple checked everything and there is no refusal notice, and that's the only place it says anything 'specific' about a refusal.]

3. They've then considered a 'family life claim' under Appendix FM D-LTR.1.1 (a) to (c) and decided I fit the limited leave to remain criteria so I'm granted leave within the Immigration Rules on that basis for 30 months, then I should apply again for 30 months and after 60 months I'd qualify for settlement on basis of Family Life with a Partner. [It doesn't say the word 'Discretionary' anywhere.]

I wish I'd found this forum before I applied and had asked some questions about this, because I really don't understand what they've done in considering my application. I've always applied with valid leave and had straightforward approvals, and based on both old and new rules for partners I should easily qualify - although we didn't include the employer letters with gross salary etc., could that be the problem? Will the 'refusal' be an issue when I show this letter to my employer? [I haven't had a long-term, full-time job - part of the fun I've had in modern academia - so my salary wouldn't have been enough to continue on the PBS route.] Should I bother contacting the UKBA about the mysterious missing refusal notice, since (hopefully) the outcome would be the same, a valid 30-month visa and the option for me to apply for SET(O) based on 10-year residency in late August 2015?

Sorry for all the questions, but thanks a million for any advice! :)
Last edited by MoiMichMe on Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:54 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Casa
Moderator
Posts: 25786
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:32 pm
United Kingdom

Post by Casa » Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:38 pm

The refusal notice wouldn't mention 'Discretionary Leave' as this no longer exists. It appears that you've been given a 30 month visa under right to family life.

MoiMichMe
Newly Registered
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:49 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by MoiMichMe » Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:52 pm

Thank you so much for your reply! I guess that makes sense, although it's extremely puzzling that there is no explanation whatsoever of the reasons for refusal. Has this happened to anyone else?

In any case, should I just take this decision as good news and move on with my life without asking the UKBA for further explanation? I'm still a bit concerned there's a chance this 'refusal' would interfere with me applying for SET(O) based on 10-year residency in August 2015. Any thoughts?

Locked