- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
huh???Satya9999 wrote:How does that make a difference, as all stays outside are less than 180 days.
Its simple arithmetic, the date you start counting your absences from does make a difference. In your case, you appear to have absences which come close to the allowed threshold in each year (160, 165, 170, 175 etc...). Therefore there is always the distinct possibility that you may exceed the 180 day annual threshold, when you change the date you start counting them from.Satya9999 wrote:How does that make a difference, as all stays outside are less than 180 days.
Satya9999 wrote:Hi,
Thanks for the responses.
When i go through few forms i can still see ppl talking about whether 180 days for 5 years or 180 days per year that you can spend out of the country.
Do we have any cases where A person got ILR after this new rules are implemented?
Also one more question, all those days that i stayed Outside country are my personal visits. i got salary for few days as i worked from Home(outside UK) but there is no letter from company.
Is this Ok?
No proof is needed if you on Tier 1 Generalgirish wrote:Hi uksettlement,
Does that mean that we can be away from UK for upto 180 days and not required to show any proof.
I spoke with a solicitor and her reply is as below:
Although the Immigration Rules have changed stating that an individual can have absences of 180 days per year, you will still be required to provide documentary evidence of all your absences. You will also need to demonstrate that the UK was your main base during your absence.
Is the above statement correct ? If so; what proof do i need to show as i was sent to India on staff rotation policy at that time with 4.5 months Gap
Thanks
uksettlement wrote:#girish wrote:Hi uksettlement,
Does that mean that we can be away from UK for upto 180 days and not required to show any proof.
I spoke with a solicitor and her reply is as below:
Although the Immigration Rules have changed stating that an individual can have absences of 180 days per year, you will still be required to provide documentary evidence of all your absences. You will also need to demonstrate that the UK was your main base during your absence.
Is the above statement correct ? If so; what proof do i need to show as i was sent to India on staff rotation policy at that time with 4.5 months Gap
Thanks
Guys!!Listen to the Expert uksettlement's advice.
No proof is needed if you on Tier 1 General
[/quote]Kevin24 wrote:
Guys!!Listen to the Expert uksettlement's advice.
No proof is needed if you on Tier 1 General
If you read the statement I've highlighted in blue carefully, you'll notice that it says evidence is only required if the absences were due to serious or compelling compassionate reasons. Evidence, as specified above, must be provided for compelling or compassionate reasons onlygirish wrote:From that statement you provided; it sounds like evidence is required for tier-1 visa ?