- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
do you have PROOF that the child is dependant upon you? (not your unborn baby, but your g/fs child... - IE: doctors letters, school, ETC ETC ETC)emmanuel_femi2003 wrote:My baby not due until october. And I am resposible for the care of my gfs child from a previous relationship
I would advise contacting a solicitor too... does retention of rights - apply? Are you employed? have you been employed since splitting with your ex wife? (basically, EEA law states if you get a divorce, your rights remain, if you act in the manner as an EEA national - IE: Are a worker / self employed)2. In all actions relating to children, wheather taken by public or
private instistions,the child's best interest must be a primary
consideration.
3. Every child shall have the right to maintain a personal
relationship on a regular basis and a direct contact with both his
or her both parents, unless that is in contrast to his or her best
interests.
note: unlike a pregnant woman, they can remove you at any point...emmyfem20 wrote:hello thanks .. yeah am not breaking my terms of temporary admission ive been going to the reporting when they asked me to.. thanks
With your suggestion, the OP will have to meet up with new financial requirement.LEGAL SOLUTION wrote:the best option for you is to apply as unmarried partner of a british national. you have a baby on the way, so you ll get it.
you can pm me if u want detail advice
NOT when the baby is BORNmanymen wrote:With your suggestion, the OP will have to meet up with new financial requirement.LEGAL SOLUTION wrote:the best option for you is to apply as unmarried partner of a british national. you have a baby on the way, so you ll get it.
you can pm me if u want detail advice
right and wrong:toni34 wrote:but nowadays it is not easy.
The decision, while clearly illustrating the principle for which Lord Bingham cites it, does not say or imply that the minimum level of severity required to bring a case within the article is a special or a high one.
....
28. It follows, in our judgment, that while an interference with private or family life must be real if it is to engage art. 8(1), the threshold of engagement (the "minimum level") is not a specially high one. Once the article is engaged, the focus moves, as Lord Bingham's remaining questions indicate, to the process of justification under art. 8(2). It is this which, in all cases which engage article 8(1), will determine whether there has been a breach of the article.
I assume that you managed to have your marriage done? If so, then be specific about what help you really want.emmanuel_femi2003 wrote:Thanks. Please I really need advice on what next step to take as I am really confused and worried. Different solicitors saying different things. Please help me people of this forum. I need a ideas