- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Jambo, isn't this the case only if a dual British/EEA national has not exercised treaty rights in (self) employment in another EU/EEA member state prior to an application for a non-EEA family member?Jambo wrote:Are you aware that by becoming British, you will not be able to make use of EEA regulations in future (to bring family member for example) and will be subject to the more strict UK immigration rules?
This is all true. However, using Surinder Singh is not always an easy option (moving with family, finding employment etc) so I just wanted to highlight there are disadvantages (immigration wise) becoming British which not everyone might be aware of.Plum70 wrote:Jambo, isn't this the case only if a dual British/EEA national has not exercised treaty rights in (self) employment in another EU/EEA member state prior to an application for a non-EEA family member?
So, say my husband (Swiss/British) and I emigrate to CH and spend a year working/running a paying business and then decide to return to the UK, we would still be able to apply for a EEA family permit for a parents if they were dependants - correct?
If so then I do not see the substantial disadvantage in dual citizenship IF an EEA national feels strongly about naturalising. It simply means that they do not have more rights than sole British nationals.
Got that and it makes sense to highlight.Jambo wrote: This is all true. However, using Surinder Singh is not always an easy option (moving with family, finding employment etc) so I just wanted to highlight there are disadvantages (immigration wise) becoming British which not everyone might be aware of.