Naughty naughty. I am not sure of exact policy but I do know that she will now be better off getting a visa before travelling even if waiver protocols exist.
Although you do not need a visa, you may want to obtain one before you travel (for example, if you have a criminal record or you have previously been refused permission to enter the UK). And you will need a visa if you want to come here in some categories of visitor (such as a visitor for marriage or civil partnership). The Visiting the UK section contains more information.
The success of future applications will depend on meeting the criteria required and the type of visa applied for. e.g. hurdle will be much higher for general visitor than for spouse visa (adverse immigration history does not matter for spouse/fiancee visa compared to general).
Was she given a notice of refusal? That would help clarify whether the following applies. Further applications may be refused under para. 320 because the ECO:
has evidence that an applicant has...used deception in an entry clearance, leave to enter or remain application.
and further:
ECOs need to consider whether it is appropriate to refuse the applicant under paragraph 320(11) of the immigration rules where the applicant has 'previously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules.'
She may be automatically be refused entry if 320 (7B) applied for:
12 months if they left the UK voluntarily, not at the expense (directly or indirectly) of the Secretary of State;
2 years if they left the UK voluntarily, at the expense (directly or indirectly) of the Secretary of State, more than 2 years ago; and the date the person left the UK was no more than 6 months after the date on which the person was given notice of the removal decision, or no more than 6 months after the date on which the person no longer had a pending appeal; whichever is the later
5 years if they left UK voluntarily, at public expense;
5 years if they were removed from the UK as a condition of a caution issued in accordance with s.134 Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
10 years if they were removed or deported from the UK;
10 years if they practised deception (which includes using false documentation) in support of a previous visa application.
In your case the following
may apply (need that notice of refusal to really diagnose).
RFL5.8 320(7B) and the use of false representations, information and documents
If an applicant has previously been refused entry clearance because a false document was used or a false representation was made, the applicant may claim that they were unaware that the document or representation was false.
Unless the applicant can prove this, they must be automatically refused under paragraph 320(7B) for 10 years from the date deception was used (unless paragraph A320 applies). Where the documents relate directly to the applicant (for example, employment references, qualifications or financial details), such a claim would be likely to fail unless the applicant has clear evidence that an error has been made (for example, written confirmation from a financial institution that they had previously supplied us with incorrect information).
. she was coming on holiday with me but we thought it would be easier if we said we were family and then immigration established we were not family and refused her entry. I know it was extremely stupid to lie about something like that but i was afriad they would not let her in and being very ignorant of the correct procedures which i have now seen would of been not issue if i took the correct steps.
i feel better now that you told me that there is hope. thanks alot for your help.