- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
nickb wrote:Hi
I had applied for Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa under the PSW category. I recently got rejected on the grounds that I do not satisfy the point of being registered as a director of a company in the last 3 months. This is a complete contradiction as I did submit the Current Appointments Report from Companies House which is what is required according to the policy guidance. The caseworker doesn't even acknowledge receiving this document in the rejection letter.
I recently appealed and received the appeal bundle from the home office. The strange thing is that the caseworker has attached the CAR that I had sent with my application and even then he has still rejected my application. I don't actually understand the grounds for rejection!
Another issue was that I was give 0 points for English language requirement because I had not attached my university certificate. I don't have the original certificate so instead of that I had sent the official university transcripts which is what is stated in the policy guidance but the caseworker says that's not enough which is again wrong according to the policy guidance because you can send official university transcripts if you don't have you the original university certificate.
My hearing date is not for another 3 months and its really annoying. I had applied in the last week of September and got my decision in mid-March. Appealed straightaway but just wanted to ask the members on the forum of what they think about this case and if there is a quicker way to solve this issue than to go thru the appeal process.
Thanks.
Please read the post carefully. I mentioned that my hearing date is not for another 3 months.ai'sh wrote:Hi Just wondering if you got hearing for your appeal and what was the result, I have recently joined the group . My visa got refused on the same issue as yours.I am appealing against the case . Please let me know if it worked out for you.
Why would you get rejected for submitting a copy of the CAR. In the policy guidance, it clearly says that "You must obtain a printout of the Current Appointment Report from Companies House". It doesn't say anything about it being original etc which is usually mentioned when that is the case. And moreover, those printouts are time-stamped so they can easily be verified in case of any doubt.entrepreneur123 wrote:Sorry to hear that.
Could you please put actual detailed summary of rejection here? As will understand better by reading actual wording.
I think they might have rejected you for submitting copy of Current Appointment Report...nickb wrote:Hi
I had applied for Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa under the PSW category. I recently got rejected on the grounds that I do not satisfy the point of being registered as a director of a company in the last 3 months. This is a complete contradiction as I did submit the Current Appointments Report from Companies House which is what is required according to the policy guidance. The caseworker doesn't even acknowledge receiving this document in the rejection letter.
I recently appealed and received the appeal bundle from the home office. The strange thing is that the caseworker has attached the CAR that I had sent with my application and even then he has still rejected my application. I don't actually understand the grounds for rejection!
Another issue was that I was give 0 points for English language requirement because I had not attached my university certificate. I don't have the original certificate so instead of that I had sent the official university transcripts which is what is stated in the policy guidance but the caseworker says that's not enough which is again wrong according to the policy guidance because you can send official university transcripts if you don't have you the original university certificate.
My hearing date is not for another 3 months and its really annoying. I had applied in the last week of September and got my decision in mid-March. Appealed straightaway but just wanted to ask the members on the forum of what they think about this case and if there is a quicker way to solve this issue than to go thru the appeal process.
Thanks.
nickb wrote:Why would you get rejected for submitting a copy of the CAR. In the policy guidance, it clearly says that "You must obtain a printout of the Current Appointment Report from Companies House". It doesn't say anything about it being original etc which is usually mentioned when that is the case. And moreover, those printouts are time-stamped so they can easily be verified in case of any doubt.entrepreneur123 wrote:Sorry to hear that.
Could you please put actual detailed summary of rejection here? As will understand better by reading actual wording.
I think they might have rejected you for submitting copy of Current Appointment Report...nickb wrote:Hi
I had applied for Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa under the PSW category. I recently got rejected on the grounds that I do not satisfy the point of being registered as a director of a company in the last 3 months. This is a complete contradiction as I did submit the Current Appointments Report from Companies House which is what is required according to the policy guidance. The caseworker doesn't even acknowledge receiving this document in the rejection letter.
I recently appealed and received the appeal bundle from the home office. The strange thing is that the caseworker has attached the CAR that I had sent with my application and even then he has still rejected my application. I don't actually understand the grounds for rejection!
Another issue was that I was give 0 points for English language requirement because I had not attached my university certificate. I don't have the original certificate so instead of that I had sent the official university transcripts which is what is stated in the policy guidance but the caseworker says that's not enough which is again wrong according to the policy guidance because you can send official university transcripts if you don't have you the original university certificate.
My hearing date is not for another 3 months and its really annoying. I had applied in the last week of September and got my decision in mid-March. Appealed straightaway but just wanted to ask the members on the forum of what they think about this case and if there is a quicker way to solve this issue than to go thru the appeal process.
Thanks.