- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
hi pablito,Pablito wrote:Welcome everybody again
So we have second refusal of FP on similar ground as before, however this time we are not claimed to be marriage of convenience. This time the letter states that we are not durable relationship because we failed to provide evidence of mutual cohabitation and assets.
As a matter of fact my wife attached explanatory letter this time, where we pointed out that previous decision was made with prejudice to UK immigration Law and that no such proof should be asked from us. However we still attached a certification from highest local official that we lived together in the Philippines.
I am sure that ECO deliberately omitted the evidence again to simply refuse the application.
Here is what we would like to do;
We would like to appeal against decision, but I have a problem because, the latest next month I will want to get to UK with my wife by coach, so what will happen with our appeal? and also I would like to complain to European Commission and Solvit. I don't want to let it go so easily, because of the disregard the ECO has for our rights.
I will much appreciate your advice, if I can appeal here while travel to UK, or maybe I can travel to UK and appeal there? What to do guys?
Advance Thanks
So sorry to hear that.Pablito wrote:Thank You guys for answers
Apparently, I've already complained to Solvit and European Commission, I also wrote a letter to visa manager asking for review of a decision, basing on the fact that it is only necessary to prove family link by providing marriage certificate and we don't need to prove that we have joint accounts or house rent agreement. We will see if this will give any effect.
UKforever, you are right, this is what we will do, but we still need to wait little longer until the month ends because we have some temporary work here. Actually at this point I don't know if there's no problem in appealing here and then travel to UK and wait for decision? Or if I manage to get to UK before the 28days for appeal passes I could proceed with appeal in country?
Thanks Guys
The ECOs are often ignorant of the law. Which is shocking.Pablito wrote:So we have second refusal of FP on similar ground as before, however this time we are not claimed to be marriage of convenience. This time the letter states that we are not durable relationship because we failed to provide evidence of mutual cohabitation and assets.
Pablito wrote:Dear Sir/Madam (Visa Manager)
I am writing to you, due to the decision made on my application for “Family Permit” as spouse of EU national. I believe the decision made was in breach of EU Law (Directive 2004/38/EC).
The Entry Clearance Officer dealing with our application had come to the conclusion that lack of evidence of cohabitation and joint finances is decisive factor to classify our marriage as “durable relationship” under Directive, despite that he/she was provided with marriage certificates from Poland and Philippines, The ECO decided to refuse the application.
I have allowed myself to attach the copy of “Visa application submission receipt” from Worldbridge in this letter which clearly states that one of the documents supplied is “Proof of residence in Philippines” this I believe was deliberately overlooked as there was also cover letter, in which I explained the circumstances of mine and my husband in the Philippines (which is attached also) and neither of these were even mentioned in refusal letter.
Both with my husband believe that decision made was unlawful and not in conformity with Articles 5 and 6 of the Directive. I believe I should had been issued visa by providing only proof of family link (marriage certificate) and passport. No further requirements can be be expected for this kind of visa, financial assets etc…
At this point I have already commenced complaint procedures to Solvit, European Commission and European Parliament in this matter, it is our intent to seek compensation for any time lost and my husband being unable to exercise his right of free movement due to unlawful decision that affects our family life.
Therefore I would like to kindly request you for reconsideration and to overturn the decision and to issue me with visa as soon as possible, as we wish to leave Switzerland very soon. We are hopeful that this matter would be resolved by you and we could stop further complaints and appeal procedures.
Good luck.Pablito wrote:UKforever, it is "impossible" to send an email to the embassy, at least according to UKBA on their website. I send the letter today and I asked for "signed for" so I will also have proof that the letter was sent. Thanks anyways for your kind suggestion.
what about the letter of refusal,there is no email at all where u should send your inquiries/complaints..??i'm sure i've read somewhere of peoples applying for FP who managed to send emails to the embassy they applied from..!!Pablito wrote:UKforever, it is "impossible" to send an email to the embassy, at least according to UKBA on their website. I send the letter today and I asked for "signed for" so I will also have proof that the letter was sent. Thanks anyways for your kind suggestion.
hey bablito,any news regarding the letter u sent,any reply or even an acknowledgement letter?ukforever wrote:what about the letter of refusal,there is no email at all where u should send your inquiries/complaints..??i'm sure i've read somewhere of peoples applying for FP who managed to send emails to the embassy they applied from..!!Pablito wrote:UKforever, it is "impossible" to send an email to the embassy, at least according to UKBA on their website. I send the letter today and I asked for "signed for" so I will also have proof that the letter was sent. Thanks anyways for your kind suggestion.
ukforever wrote:hey bablito,any news regarding the letter u sent,any reply or even an acknowledgement letter?ukforever wrote:what about the letter of refusal,there is no email at all where u should send your inquiries/complaints..??i'm sure i've read somewhere of peoples applying for FP who managed to send emails to the embassy they applied from..!!Pablito wrote:UKforever, it is "impossible" to send an email to the embassy, at least according to UKBA on their website. I send the letter today and I asked for "signed for" so I will also have proof that the letter was sent. Thanks anyways for your kind suggestion.
The only evidence that you are required to submit is a copy of your marriage certificate. If they then suspect it is a marriage of convenience, they can then ask for additional evidence, but they have not done so.You have applied for an EEA Family Permit by virtue of your relationship with your [EU country] national
spouse. I note the copy of your spouse's polish passport and copy of your marriage certificate,
which states you were married on [date], you have submitted as evidence. I note the
photographs you have submitted as evidence of your relationship however you have failed to
provide any evidence that you have been cohabiting as couple, any evidence of joint finances or
joint responsibilities before or since your marriage. Therefore I am not satisfied you have
demonstrated that you have been in a 'durable relationship' with your spouse for more than two years.
New case law on marriages wrote:The first of these is Papajorgji (EEA spouse – marriage of convenience) Greece [2012] UKUT 00038 (IAC), in which the tribunal notes that there is no burden on the applicant to prove that a marriage to an EEA is not a marriage of convenience. The tribunal goes on to highlight EU guidance on the issue of abuse of EU free movement rights and marriages of convenience that appeared on this blog as long ago as November 2009 (courtesy of the wonderful Elspeth Guild at the ILPA AGM that year). The guidance is very informative and helpful and the full version available here.
vinny wrote:Do click on my given links.
New case law on marriages wrote:The first of these is Papajorgji (EEA spouse – marriage of convenience) Greece [2012] UKUT 00038 (IAC), in which the tribunal notes that there is no burden on the applicant to prove that a marriage to an EEA is not a marriage of convenience. The tribunal goes on to highlight EU guidance on the issue of abuse of EU free movement rights and marriages of convenience that appeared on this blog as long ago as November 2009 (courtesy of the wonderful Elspeth Guild at the ILPA AGM that year). The guidance is very informative and helpful and the full version available here.