- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
You've been given lots of conflicting information...frustratedbrit wrote:I am a UK national with non-EEA wife and stepson. They are currently living with me on a 6-month visitor visa in the UK (and my stepson's father has given written consent for his son to live with me and my wife). I have been offered a job in the Netherlands (initially for 3 months, but which may extend). I plan to use European Directive 2004/38/EC twice, first to take my family to the Netherlands, and second to bring them permanently back to the UK once I've finished working in the Netherlands.
I've been going mad over the last 4 weeks with conflicting advice from the Dutch embassy in London, the VFS in London and the IND in the Netherlands. According to the IND, I just need short-term visas (Schengen?) to bring them with me into the Netherlands, and only need to show that our marriage is genuine (marriage certificate, photos, etc). But last week the VFS refused to accept our application, and suggested we talk to the embassy. The latest advice from the embassy is that my wife can indeed get accelerated visa entry (presumably via the Directive 2004/38/EC), but that my stepson needs to apply for an MVV permit, which can take "several months". Unless, that is, I become a legal guardian of my stepson (which will no doubt also take several months, given that his father, although likely to consent, is not residing in the EEA let alone the UK, and cannot speak English).
Is this advice from the embassy right? I would have thought that my 6-year-old stepson could travel under the same conditions as his mother, and that he has a basic human right of living with his mother. Isn't this breaking Directive 2004/38? If the advice is not right, what can I do about it?
My job is due to start on Monday, but luckily my employers will probably allow me to delay starting, probably for up to 4 months. My family's UK visas expire in mid July. I don't want to be living apart from them for more than a couple of weeks if this is at all possible. Any advice anyone? Are other EEA countries more lenient on their interpretation of Directive 2004/38? How about Germany or France (where I can likely find work), or the East European EU countries?
You should be able to expect priority treatment, so far faster than this. But the reality is often far slower.frustratedbrit wrote:So would I be right in saying that my family should expect to receive visas within 2-3 weeks of a booked appointment, that these visas should be Schengen visas, and that we should not expect to pay any fees?
It was at a university, as a researcher. This work was highly relevant to my career, as it happens. Before this opportunity arose, I was thinking of just moving to Paris (I get the impression 2004/38 immigration is much easier in France, but I don't know whether I'm right about this), where a few friends of mine live, and finding casual work in a cafe or something. The advantage with this university position is of course that its authenticity cannot be questioned. What I didn't realise was that the Dutch immigration system, and indeed Dutch life in general, has so much red tape. So I'm not sure if I recommend Holland, because of all the administrative hassles. On the other hand, if you take into account all the details of my experiences, I'm sure you'll have a smoother ride than I had. And Holland's a great country to live in. And everyone speaks English!chaoclive wrote:Could I ask what kind of job you managed to find in the Netherlands?
I'm thinking about Surinder Singh too but not sure where to go...
I have no idea how they even pretend to justify asking for this. There is not way that it can hold up.Proof of sufficient and long-term means of support to prevent a situation in which you have to rely on public funds during your stay in the Netherlands.
If you are working, then there is no requirement for you to have adequate resources.frustratedbrit wrote:I think I saw a paragraph in Directive 2004/38 that said if you were living in the country for longer than 3 months, then the country were allowed to stipulate a minimal amount of income or savings to ensure that you're not a "burden" on the state.
Actually, looking at it again, I'm not so sure. Article 7, Paragraph 1 is about stays of longer than 3 months. 1(a) says that a worker has a right of residence, 1(b) talks about sufficient resources not to be a burden, but (a) *or* (b) are sufficient.
Maybe it's because my employment was only 3 months and not "longer than 3 months".
However, I suspect that it's officials not knowing the rules inside out. All along I've had inconsistent advice from Dutch authorities about everything. It seems they've made the rules so complicated, they are incapable of implementing them correctly.
Yes, I should complain.
The answer is no, there is not and never should be any fee for the visa.frustratedbrit wrote:My question is this: Do we really have to pay the 140 euro fee for return visas, given that I'm an EEA citizen? Alternatively, can't we just apply again for free temporary Schengen visas, according to our rights under Directive 2004/38/EC, to get back into Holland (like we did successfully the first time we entered the country)?
Have fun and get everything on paper! Take your time and keep super cool!Directive 2004/38/EC
CHAPTER II RIGHT OF EXIT AND ENTRY
Article 5 -- Right of entry
1. Without prejudice to the provisions on travel documents applicable to national border controls, Member States shall grant Union citizens leave to enter their territory with a valid identity card or passport and shall grant family members who are not nationals of a Member State leave to enter their territory with a valid passport.
No entry visa or equivalent formality may be imposed on Union citizens.
2. Family members who are not nationals of a Member State shall only be required to have an entry visa in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 or, where appropriate, with national law. For the purposes of this Directive, possession of the valid residence card referred to in Article 10 shall exempt such family members from the visa requirement.
Member States shall grant such persons every facility to obtain the necessary visas. Such visas shall be issued free of charge as soon as possible and on the basis of an accelerated procedure.