- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
1) I'll just chime in a bit although I'm admittedly not very familiar with the absence period allowed for 10yr applications. If the any-one-time absence period allowed is 180 days (looks like it is) then, depending on the exact dates you left and returned, you should be ok.K4 wrote:Hey everyone
I am new here so hopefully I put my question in the right place and someone will answer my question
I came to UK as a student in 2004 got 4 years visa from Pakistan after i got one year extension. i left UK in october 2009 and came back in march 2010 with a fresh student visa from Pakistan. I made two 1 month visits to Pakistan in 2006.
i want to know:
1) Is there any chance to go under the 10 year rule which i will complete in 2014?
2) If yes what i have to do?
3) Do I have o produce all certificates since 2004 as i don't have all of them?
4) I have 9 points on my licence all speeding first ones i got in 2010 and last ones 2012?
5) Can i go back to Pakistan for a visit?
6) Who should I choose to be my solicitor?
thanks in advance
Continuous residence is considered to be broken if the applicant has:
been absent from the UK for a period of more than 180 days at any one time, or is absent from the UK for a shorter period but does not have valid leave to enter the UK on their return, or valid leave to remain on their departure from the UK
spent a total of 540 days outside the UK throughout the whole 10 year period.
I suggest you calculate the days you have been absent from the UK and this will tell you whether you can go back home before you apply.Time spent outside the UK
Continuous residence is not considered broken if the applicant:
is absent from the UK for 180 days or less at any one time, and
had existing leave to enter or remain when they left and when they returned – this can include leave gained at port when returning to the UK as a non visa national
By my reckoning, that single period is less than 180 days (144).K4 wrote:Hey guys thanks for getting back I left UK on 29 October 2009 I had visa till 31 October 2009 and came back on 22 march 2010 with new visa.
Just make sure you report the visa refusals on the application (if it asks). Otherwise, those other dates outside of the UK are inconsequential.K4 wrote: Other than that I visited Pakistan in June 2006 and December 2006 for one month and also I forgot to mention I went to Paris in 2005 for 5 days. I had a valid leave to remain at that time. Also just just remembered once in 2009 my visa for France was rejected due to in complete docs and 2009 again when I applied from Pakistan for UK student visa it got refused due to in complete docs again.
For this type of application, any evidence of your presence in the UK is probably good evidence to include.K4 wrote: The certificates I am on about are the study certificates to prove I was in the country do you need them?? Or the stamps on your passport proves it.
I don't want to knock the use of solicitor. If you feel a greater peace of mind using one, then by all means it is worth it. Just make sure they are qualified and registered with the appropriate UK accrediting bodies as experts in this field. But they won't be able to give any better a 'window' than is stated on the UKBA website or that others here could estimate (I believe there is a sticky thread for timelines on this sub-forum). And you're still going to have to gather together all of that evidence, which is the real legwork (unless you invite the lawyer into your home to start doing a physical document search )K4 wrote: About Solicitor I was thinking they know the whole crack they can do all the leg work if needed and one more thing is it good to go to the window for it or should I lodge an application via post and wait.
There are always changes in the rules. They cannot be predicted. Sometimes those changes are (unfairly IMO) retroactive. We get some advance warning on many of those changes, but not always. The overwhelming consensus of established posters here is if there is a choice between ILR and any 'temporary' visa, assuming you would qualify for both without any complications, ALWAYS go for ILR. There are a few dissenting voices on that stance, but their reasoning is unsound in my opinion. If you can get ILR, and it looks like you can in a fairly straightforward fashion, get it.K4 wrote: Last but not the least are there any changes happening in the rules for it? I have heard different stories. I have applied for a extension on a course which will be till August 2015.