- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
I might try that actually and apply for PR sooner than October. Thanks for the tip. Just for information, and please correct me if I'm wrong, was that law enforced in 2012 or was it before that?EUsmileWEallsmile wrote: For the time that you were a student, the UK did not insist that students hold CSI, though it was in the regulations. It may be possible for you to argue that it was not an enforced requirement.
If you have these documents and you are dealing your tax matters personally then i do not think the absence of such letter will cause much problem. But a detailed information regarding self employment for treaty rights can be found:anettes wrote:I can do that, that should be OK, it's only the letter that I can't get...sheraz7 wrote:the most important thing is to demonstrate economic activities which can be proved with invoices, NI payments, tax returns, business bank statements etc.
Not sure what CSI news you refer to. You are not exempt from providing evidence to cover your student years. As your main concern is getting PR confirmed before the delivery is due, I would think that there is no reason not to wait until October.anettes wrote:Great, thank you Sheraz7! thank you all so much, you've been brilliant!
I'm so happy for the CSI news and that I don't have to wait to October to apply! I will also try to provide as much detail as possible re my income and self employment and hope for the best!
thank you
thank you EUsmileWEallsmile - if I don't make as much as I used to make before, now that I will be pregnant, as self employed - does this count as unemployment?EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:It makes sense to make the application as simple as possible. More recent evidence is often easier to come by. Spouses activities will help for any periods of unemployment provided he is exercising treaty rights.
This is absolutely ridiculous! How can this process make sense to people! I never applied for registration certificate and this means that I can't apply for PR this year and I will have to wait until October 2014 because my year as a student won't be accepted as exercising EU treaty rights.EUsmileWEallsmile wrote: Generally, to achieve PR, one needs to have lived in the UK in accordance with the regulations for five years. For students, the requirements are to have been enrolled in a recognised place of study and to have sufficient funds plus comprehensive insurance (CSI). Absences of up to six months per year were allowed. Now, the UK did not enforce the requirement for CSI on students up to recently. After the date on which they enforced this, they stated that anyone who had applied (on EEA1) prior to the policy change would not require CSI. Those who had failed to apply would indeed require to have it.
Applying for an EEA1 was not (and is still not mandatory). It could be argued that CSI should not be required for those who were studying prior to the policy change. Equally, it could be argued that those that received it were lucky.
I am not aware of any case law that clarifies matters.
I would agree that the policy as applied is inherently unfair. Notwithstanding the fact that it was open to the UK to insist on CSI, they could have applied a policy that those who became students after June 2011 required to have CSI.anettes wrote:Unfortunately, I've just found the following in the European Casework Instructions, Chapter 6, page 16 http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitec ... iew=Binary
Note: These arrangements apply only to EEA nationals applying for
permanent residence documentation (or for exempt registration
certificates for A2 nationals) on the basis of being a student where they
have been issued with a registration certificate in that capacity before
20th June 2011.
Where an application for permanent residence is received on the basis
that the EEA national is a student, but they have never been granted a
registration certificate, then they must show evidence that they have had
comprehensive sickness insurance for the duration of their time spent as
student
I never applied for a registration certificate, as it's not mandatory for EEA nationals and only voluntary so I never applied for it as I had the right to work in the UK (they didn't ask for it when I applied for my NI!!)
Does anyone know what happens in this case?
I thought that it's OK that I didn't have CSI for the time I was a student but this changes everything??
The fact that your husband is self-employed will help you going forward in the event that you are unable to continue your employment.anettes wrote:He is self employed and hopefully he will be able to support both of us when I won't have many projects.
Does this mean that for the time when I don't make enough as S.E. he will be able to fill in for me in the application?
However, he only started work in December '12, before that he was a student without CSI as it was never asked by the Uni.
thanks again :)
Thank you EUsmileWEallsmile for your reply.EUsmileWEallsmile wrote: I would agree that the policy as applied is inherently unfair. Notwithstanding the fact that it was open to the UK to insist on CSI, they could have applied a policy that those who became students after June 2011 required to have CSI.
The HO view is that CSI has been required since 2006 (but not enforced). You can't claim to be exempt from it if you didn't apply as the law requires you to have one. However, if you did apply and the HO didn't say anything about CSI, then the HO can't expect you to hold something they didn't ask for (even if it is required by the regulations). That's the reason for the exemption.sheraz7 wrote:As EUsmile mentioned above is correct that your partner's activities can also ease your case for acquiring PR. But this CSI requirement with regard to students is really silly because on on hand UKBA say that after 20th June, 2011 all the students need to hold CSI even including the students who never applied Registration certificate before this date. Whereas on the other hand as per EU law an EU national is not required to apply the EEA1 registration certificate and is optional. Under this sense it should be challengable/arguable because you studied before this date and you as EU national is not bound to apply Registration certificate to confirm your rights.
Not to forget that the European Commission is questioning the need for CSI in a country such as the UK (where citizens don't need to pay for state medical insurance). The CSI requirement might all change in a few years.sheraz7 wrote:Jambo, your logic is also accurate. This CSI dilemma even the caseworkers also do not know themselves as what actually it is?