ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

ILR - Long Residence or SET(M)?

Only for queries regarding Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). Please use the EU Settlement Scheme forum for queries about settled status under Appendix EU

Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix

Locked
Zman88
Newly Registered
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:06 pm

ILR - Long Residence or SET(M)?

Post by Zman88 » Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:23 pm

Hi all, first of all thank you in advance for all your opinions and advice.

I will be applying for ILR in a few months time. I will be eligible for 10 years long residence soon and my FLR(M) will also be expiring around the same time.

1. What I'd like to know is does one have better chance than the other?

2. Can I apply for SET(LR) in stead of SET(M)? The reason for this is because my partner who is a British citizen has lost his job recently and we are both relying solely on my income at the moment. I'm just worried my partner not having a job will lower my chances of being successful in SET(M). Would that be a big problem?

Having said that, I'm also currently leaning towards the SET(M) at the moment because if i managed to get an appointment through PEO, i can get it over with very quickly but at the same time i'm worried about my chances because of my partner's unemployment.

What are your thoughts guys? Your help would be very much appreciated.

Thank you all.

Amber
Moderator
Posts: 17506
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:20 am
Location: England, UK
Mood:
United Kingdom

Post by Amber » Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:41 pm

I would say set(m) using the settlement checking service (click) or premium PEO. It does not matter if the 'sponsor' is working, if the applicant is, and is able to adequately maintain and accommodate.
**this forum is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice**
Click here to send me a PM regarding an offensive post. Do NOT PM me for immigration advice.

Zman88
Newly Registered
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:06 pm

Post by Zman88 » Sat Jul 13, 2013 11:18 pm

Thank you very much indeed for your reply Amber. One other question though, I have been looking around immigration advisors' websites and some of them offers same day fast track application for SEt(M) where they will represent me. Are these genuine at all?

Amber
Moderator
Posts: 17506
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:20 am
Location: England, UK
Mood:
United Kingdom

Post by Amber » Sun Jul 14, 2013 9:35 am

Zman88 wrote:Thank you very much indeed for your reply Amber. One other question though, I have been looking around immigration advisors' websites and some of them offers same day fast track application for SEt(M) where they will represent me. Are these genuine at all?
Again do not bother with solicitors unless your case is unusually complex. Even if you wish to use the premium service (a PEO appointment) for a 'same day decision', use the SCS first before you go and they should ensure you have no issues. The postal service using the SCS is making decisions in as fast as 3 weeks.
**this forum is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice**
Click here to send me a PM regarding an offensive post. Do NOT PM me for immigration advice.

Locked