ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

SET M - Greater than 180 days gap

Only for queries regarding Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). Please use the EU Settlement Scheme forum for queries about settled status under Appendix EU

Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix

Locked
trueindian2013
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:26 pm
India

SET M - Greater than 180 days gap

Post by trueindian2013 » Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:44 pm

Hi

I am applying ILR for my wife for settlement (I got ILR in Oct 2012). She completed 2 years. She got entry clearence as Tier 2 ICT dependent in June 2010. There is no break in her leave (dependent visa).

However, she went to India on maternity and stayed there for about 10 months.

Here is the immigration histroy:

Jun 2010 - Got her Tier 2 ICT dependent Visa
Jan 2011 - Got extension for dependent visa up to Nov '12
Jul 2011 to May 2012 (10 months) - Stayed in India due to maternity. My baby was born in India
Oct 2012 - I got my ILR (Tier 2 ICT - 5 year route)
Nov 2012 - applied for ILR dependent for my wife (FLR - M)
Apr 2013 - got ILR dependent visa for my wife and baby

Questions:

1. My wife has completed more than 2 years now in UK. However, she is away from UK for a period of 10 months due to maternity. Will this result in application rejection? Note, she got continuous visa (no break in here visa duration)
2. She got ILR dependent visa (FLR - M) in Apr 2013. Will new rules apply (5 years for dependent to settle) or old rules apply (2 years for dependent to settle)?
3. My daughter born in India came to UK in May 2012. She hasn't finished 2 years in UK. Is she eligible for settlement?

Thanks in advance for your support and help. Appreciate your time.

Amber
Moderator
Posts: 17506
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:20 am
Location: England, UK
Mood:
United Kingdom

Post by Amber » Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:00 pm

You would have transitional protection thus would be under the old rules, 2 years qualifying period. Absences should be limited and for good reason, maternity for cultural and family reasons should suffice but you can explain to the caseworker upon arrival for your PEO (take flr(m) in case), your daughter would be applying at the same time as your spouse. Your wife could have continued on her PBS dep visa rather than switching to flr(m).
Last edited by Amber on Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
**this forum is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice**
Click here to send me a PM regarding an offensive post. Do NOT PM me for immigration advice.

vinny
Moderator
Posts: 33338
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:58 pm

Re: SET M - Greater than 180 days gap

Post by vinny » Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:01 pm

trueindian2013 wrote:Nov 2012 - applied for ILR dependent for my wife (FLR - M)
Apr 2013 - got ILR dependent visa for my wife and baby
Did your wife get FLR(M) after Nov 2012?
Did she apply for another entry clearance in April 2013?
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.
We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

Amber
Moderator
Posts: 17506
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:20 am
Location: England, UK
Mood:
United Kingdom

Re: SET M - Greater than 180 days gap

Post by Amber » Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:03 pm

vinny wrote:
trueindian2013 wrote:Nov 2012 - applied for ILR dependent for my wife (FLR - M)
Apr 2013 - got ILR dependent visa for my wife and baby
Did your wife get FLR(M) after Nov 2012?
Did she apply for another entry clearance in April 2013?
I do not think the spouse has been outside the UK since May 2012.
**this forum is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice**
Click here to send me a PM regarding an offensive post. Do NOT PM me for immigration advice.

trueindian2013
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:26 pm
India

Post by trueindian2013 » Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:09 pm

Thanks Vinny. My wife got flr-m in Apr 2013 in UK only. You are right, she has not gone outside UK since May 2012.

Regarding my daughter, she hasn't completed 2 years in uk as she was born in Dec 2011 and came to UK in May 2012 along with her mother.

trueindian2013
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:26 pm
India

Post by trueindian2013 » Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:11 pm

We applied for flr-m as her pbs dependent has expired and she didnt complete 2 years in UK.

Amber
Moderator
Posts: 17506
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:20 am
Location: England, UK
Mood:
United Kingdom

Post by Amber » Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:17 pm

She could have extended as a PBS dep until qualifying, the child should apply with the mother.
**this forum is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice**
Click here to send me a PM regarding an offensive post. Do NOT PM me for immigration advice.

vinny
Moderator
Posts: 33338
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:58 pm

Post by vinny » Sun Aug 18, 2013 2:02 pm

D4109125 wrote:I do not think the spouse has been outside the UK since May 2012.
Thanks Amber. The use of the word 'visa' was confusing me. Technically, a 'visa' is a type of entry clearance. It's issued only from outside the UK.
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.
We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

trueindian2013
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:26 pm
India

Post by trueindian2013 » Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:17 pm

Amber, Vinny

Thanks for your swift responses. Very helpful.

To summarise, my wife is now eligible for settlement on the basis that her stay outside UK was a genuine reasons. As baby should apply along with mother, my daughter is also eligible for settlement.

Is this correct?

Also, they having FLR-m weakens the case or works against application? Or you were just advising that they could have stayed as PBS dependent.

Thanks again.

Amber
Moderator
Posts: 17506
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:20 am
Location: England, UK
Mood:
United Kingdom

Post by Amber » Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:19 pm

Just telling you that they could have. If the caseworker deems your absence limited and for good reason, then you should be fine. The English language requirement is changing on 28 Oct 2013 so should apply before then maybe?
**this forum is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice**
Click here to send me a PM regarding an offensive post. Do NOT PM me for immigration advice.

trueindian2013
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:26 pm
India

Post by trueindian2013 » Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:26 pm

Thanks Amber.

With your experience, do caseworkers treat maternity leave as a good reason and accept application?

Sorry to be pedantic but just want to understand others experiences.

Amber
Moderator
Posts: 17506
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:20 am
Location: England, UK
Mood:
United Kingdom

Post by Amber » Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:28 pm

There have been a number of recent set(m) cases where maternity absences were accepted. Only one recent set(o) application was rejected for a maternity absence. Given the fact she has been back in the UK a while, I would be surprised if it was rejected.
**this forum is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice**
Click here to send me a PM regarding an offensive post. Do NOT PM me for immigration advice.

trueindian2013
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:26 pm
India

Post by trueindian2013 » Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:31 pm

Great. Much appreciated and very very helpful. Your service is amazing.

Locked