- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
On your application form you state that you are retired and that your total monthly income is PKR 55,000 (£343.75) from rental income and your sons support. To support this you have provided an employment letter on behalf of your son, rental documents and a copy of your personal bank statements which shows that you made a series of cash deposit payments over the reporting period. These deposit payments are not sourced and do not appear to reflect your claimed salary. This means that I am not satisfied that your employment and income are as claimed or that the funds in your bank account shown are genuinely available for your use.
You state that your visit to the uk will cost you personally the cost of your travel and your wife’s which will be £500 each, but I am not satisfied the proposed expenditure is commensurate with your evidenced circumstances, however the evidence submitted by you does not corroborate your income and I do not find it credible that you would allocate this volume of funds for a 2 week visit to the UK. Given all of this I am not satisfied that your circumstances in Pakistan are as you have stated which also leads me to doubt you intentions in wishing to travel to the UK now. As a result I am not satisfied that you are genuinely seeking entry as a general visitor or that you intend to leave the UK at the end of the period of the visit as stated by you.
I have therefor refused your application because I am not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that you meet all of the requirements of the relevant Paragraph of the UK immigration rules.
Your right of appeal is limited to the grounds referred to in section 84(1) (c) of the Nationality Immigration an Asylum Act 2002 (www.legislation.gov.uk)
So in what way is the decision unlawful under section 6 of the HRA?that the decision is unlawful under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (c. 42) (public authority not to act contrary to Human Rights Convention) as being incompatible with the appellant’s Convention rights;
I understand you want to save money by not paying the bond.When your parents go back the money will be refunded so you wont loose out.tcpip_helper wrote:sorry to annoy you guys again but may i ask one more time whether i can appeal or not, i know it takes long time but if i appeal now i wont be facing the bond scheme which i want to avoid.
thanks