- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
I'm not sure this is true. Are you referencing any particular international treaties with regards to that assumption?Shadowpost wrote:Here is a question i hope you can answer.
I may one day hope to make a sovereign claim to some Terra Nullius. In order to do this i must become stateless.
No you would be stateless at that point, but there are only a few countries that allow you to renounce your citizenship without having another in tangent. The United States and Nigeria are the only two I could find from a brief internet search. I suspect Japan as well, but that will take some digging.Shadowpost wrote: I am British through ancestry, birth and residence.
I note that i could renounce British citizenship if i have citizenship for another country. If i was to gain dual nationality, renounce British Citizenship, then later on renounce the other remaining nationality, would i become Stateless or would i automatically be rendered a British Citizen again?
That point you referred to is with respect to the seas and oceans, and outer space (and I suppose technically, deep underground). And it only refers to who may claim sovereignty as an individual when not specifically in a sovereign land or claimed patch of water.Shadowpost wrote:Not referencing a treaty directly. I found the information in an un-sourced statement on the wikipedia article for Terra Nullius.
After the British Nationality Act of 1981 (into force in 1983), no person is a British Subject except for those people formerly known as British subjects without any citizenship and people born in Ireland before 1949.Shadowpost wrote:Not ideal but I figured that if i was not stateless, then i would still be a British subject and under the rule of Her majesty. Thus i could not be a sovereign, as i would be a subject.
Given that if not stateless, i would be a British subject, then surely any claim i make to Terra Nullius would automatically become a claim in the name of the Queen?
No offence, but going to all the effort and expense of acquiring and losing another country's citizenship with a view to making a "sovereign claim" over some uninhabited remote land, just based on unreferenced Wikipedia article, sounds like the person wanting to do that is crazy.Shadowpost wrote:Not referencing a treaty directly. I found the information in an un-sourced statement on the wikipedia article for Terra Nullius.