- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
No, ignorance is no defence in the eyes of the Law...Shondra Sharma wrote:Due to unaware to the immigration rules if someone can't able to apply 14 years rule before 9th july 2012 but he/she completed 14 years continuously in uk before the 14 years rule abolished, can still able to argue to the home office? They already been here 16-17, 18, 19, years in uk.
The Home Office is known for its retroactive rules, even in cases where they have literally written the rules down on the official document they have themselves issued to visa holders (the most notorious I can think of being the Work Permit holders having 4 years ILR requirements adjusted to 5 years, despite the fact that the Work Permit itself clearly stated 4 years). This has been fought before, with mixed success, typically in the Home Office's favor. Many would agree that this behavior is not acceptable. But in the end, it is a sovereign government, and they can pretty much do what they like when it comes to non-citizens and whether/how they are allowed to remain in the UK.Shondra Sharma wrote:At least home office give a chance to regulrise their stay who completed 14 years before 9th july 2012.