Home Office got access to go UTT

[marketing786]

My case time line is
Applied September 2013
Refused April 2014
Appeal allowed 2014
Home Office appealed to go UTT
UTT prmission granted.

Letter states that.
1) Section 35(a) of evidential flexibility is still arguable.
2) The conclusion is still arguable which the judge used after the day of hearing.

What do you guys think ? is there any one fasing the same situation ? The hearing day was completely in our hand and HO representative accepted her defeat and asked the judge to send it for reconcideration.

[sagareva]

"still arguable"?

is that ALL it says?

LOL home office reached its own high in terms of legal argument finesse ))

what was the point at issue on appeal?

[marketing786]

Hi Sagareva


There were so many points
all were around not submitting business plan market research cv experiance letter etc etc.
contract doest look genuine....
marketing is not been done properly


we proved a procedural mistake before calling for interview a case worker should ask for additional information as per 2013 rule and almost on every single point we justified our stance and business.
HO representative said this case should go for re concideration but judge allowed in our favour and HO challenged the decision...

Now waiting for date to appear in UTT...