- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
I was assuming that the BC children would be moving to the UK with their father before the mother submitted any application. There's also the issue of the non-BC child with the current husband. I don't see at present how they would qualify to accompany the mother if she applied for a visa enabling access to her other children in the UK.manci wrote:Doesn't seem possible as apart from any other requirement the BC children would need to be living in the UK for her to be eligible to apply.
Where is latest husband (Z) in this scheme?Humanity wrote:...
In a nut shell , how can X come to Uk and care for her kids in Uk.
None of this will work.Humanity wrote:Hi All,
Thanks for taking time to give your insights. Will try and answer every questions raised.
Yes she is planning on leaving her husband for a awhile ( not separate) to raise the kids in UK. The current Husband is in West Africa with the family, they all living as one unit.
X has Legal Custody and Parental responsibility of all the kids with her current husband, (he is willing to let them all travel to Uk for the time being).
X current Husband maintains only one nationality, home country.
Your thoughts on this please :
What if X comes to Uk with all the kids ( while she is on visit visa ) and she applies to stay behind based on derivative residency ?
Since two of the kids are already British Citizens ( I don't see HO deporting her ) Article 8 can always be raised if all fails.
In regards to the Non-British Kid, she can always register to be British Citizen when she is old enough, currently 4 ( Like I said, she is non-visa national citizen,thus she doesnt require entry permit).
I will prefer a straight forward application and avoid complicating things if possible.
Finally, if the kids need to be maintaining residency in Uk before the Mother can be invited based on Derivative residency, how long does the kid have to be in the UK for ? Once again, thanks all.
The Father is not the primary carer. The kids have no relationship with their Biological father whom they acquire their citizenship through. If the kids move to Uk , they will have to stay with a relative if the mum can not reside in Uk. Thinking Derivative can be argued on the grounds that the kids will have to leave EEA ( once they maintain residency here) without the presence on of their mum ,primary carer.Casa wrote:This fails on several counts and the following five are just for starters without going into discussion about custody etc...
1. It's not possible to switch from visitor to any other category while in the UK.
2. If the Immigration Officer at the UK port of entry suspects an intention to overstay, both her and the child will be returned on the next available flight.
3. Article 8 isn't a golden ticket and in this situation stands little chance of succeeding.
4. It doesn't appear that the youngest child (with a different father) has any right to British citizenship.
5. A derivative residence application won't succeed as she won't be the prime carer of her BC children, as it appears the father will. See below:
"You’re eligible for a derivative residence card if you’re the primary carer of someone who would have to leave the UK if you left.
The person you care for must be one of the following:
a British child who’d have to leave the EEA if you left the UK
a British dependent adult who’d have to leave the EEA if you left the UK
a child from the EEA who’s financially independent with full health insurance (‘self-sufficient’)"
This is a list of what will work.Humanity wrote:The Father is not the primary carer. The kids have no relationship with their Biological father whom they acquire their citizenship through. If the kids move to Uk , they will have to stay with a relative if the mum can not reside in Uk. Thinking Derivative can be argued on the grounds that the kids will have to leave EEA ( once they maintain residency here) without the presence on of their mum ,primary carer.Casa wrote:This fails on several counts and the following five are just for starters without going into discussion about custody etc...
1. It's not possible to switch from visitor to any other category while in the UK.
2. If the Immigration Officer at the UK port of entry suspects an intention to overstay, both her and the child will be returned on the next available flight.
3. Article 8 isn't a golden ticket and in this situation stands little chance of succeeding.
4. It doesn't appear that the youngest child (with a different father) has any right to British citizenship.
5. A derivative residence application won't succeed as she won't be the prime carer of her BC children, as it appears the father will. See below:
"You’re eligible for a derivative residence card if you’re the primary carer of someone who would have to leave the UK if you left.
The person you care for must be one of the following:
a British child who’d have to leave the EEA if you left the UK
a British dependent adult who’d have to leave the EEA if you left the UK
a child from the EEA who’s financially independent with full health insurance (‘self-sufficient’)"
Custody issue is non-existent in this case.
All that said, thoughts on what will work is also welcome NOT just what wont work. Thanks
If Zambrano is engaged then the UK cannot say so without breaching the community law rights of the British Child in Question.vinny wrote:They will probably maintain that the best interests of the British children are that they remain with their mother and their non British sibling outside the UK, not to mention the mother's current husband.
A breakup of a loving and supportive family unit may be traumatising.
no - the BC children would have to be resident in the UK to engage Zambrano. See:Humanity wrote: Can you actually engage Zambrano at the point of entry and how do you go about that.
This is so as far as UK immigration law is concerned but suppose she was able to enter as a visitor with the 2 BC children and then enrolled them in a school, would her claim for derivative right of residence under EEA rules after, say, 6 months (which may or may not be sufficient to establish resident status for the children) not override UK immigration rules subject of course to the merits of the claim?Casa wrote: 1. It's not possible to switch from visitor to any other category while in the UK.
manci wrote:no - the BC children would have to be resident in the UK to engage Zambrano. See:Humanity wrote: Can you actually engage Zambrano at the point of entry and how do you go about that.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... mbrano.pdfThis is so as far as UK immigration law is concerned but suppose she was able to enter as a visitor with the 2 BC children and then enrolled them in a school, would her claim for derivative right of residence under EEA rules after, say, 6 months (which may or may not be sufficient to establish resident status for the children) not override UK immigration rules subject of course to the merits of the claim?Casa wrote: 1. It's not possible to switch from visitor to any other category while in the UK.
Resulting in the probable traumatic split up of the family unit for child?Humanity wrote:Kindly 'disregard' the last child when responding.
It's not a golden ticket and doesn't lead to settled status.Humanity wrote:Think you spot on,it will be the most likely outcome. Kids maintain residency here and trigger EU law. Ultimately HO will aim to frustrate the application. Inevitable it will succeed. The price will be time.
I get your point vinny . Notwithstanding the fact that Regulation 15A (4A) will cover the parents, it is weird that regulation 15A (5) (b) does not extend to the other children of the primary career of Zambrano children who are not British.