Hi,
After reading numerous threads about the '£200k invested' criterion at Tier 1 (E) extension stage, I feel the need to clarify this criterion. See Immigration Rules part 6A. 245DD. k(ii):
'the applicant has genuinely invested the money referred to in Table 5 of Appendix A into one or more genuine businesses in the UK to be spent for the purpose of that business or businesses'
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration ... sed-system
The above rule states 'invested...to be spent...'. My understanding of the English language is that 'to be spent' is not the same as 'spent' -- your company does not need to have spent the whole £200k by Year 3 following director's loan (unsecured and subordinated to third parties). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
But again, in the policy guidance, there is:
'Money deposited in a bank account, even if it is in a United Kingdom business bank account, is not counted as investment in business.'
This confuses me a lot, as the immigration rule and policy guidance contradict each other.
Anyone please shed some light on this. Particularly anyone who got visa extension with £200k invested but not fully spent?
- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222