ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Director's loan: 200k invested or spent?

Only for UK Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) points system. This route is now closed to new applicants.

Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix

Locked
yoshinoya
Newly Registered
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 11:17 am

Director's loan: 200k invested or spent?

Post by yoshinoya » Wed Jun 01, 2016 5:20 pm

Hi,

After reading numerous threads about the '£200k invested' criterion at Tier 1 (E) extension stage, I feel the need to clarify this criterion. See Immigration Rules part 6A. 245DD. k(ii):

'the applicant has genuinely invested the money referred to in Table 5 of Appendix A into one or more genuine businesses in the UK to be spent for the purpose of that business or businesses'

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration ... sed-system

The above rule states 'invested...to be spent...'. My understanding of the English language is that 'to be spent' is not the same as 'spent' -- your company does not need to have spent the whole £200k by Year 3 following director's loan (unsecured and subordinated to third parties). Please correct me if I'm wrong.

But again, in the policy guidance, there is:
'Money deposited in a bank account, even if it is in a United Kingdom business bank account, is not counted as investment in business.'

This confuses me a lot, as the immigration rule and policy guidance contradict each other.

Anyone please shed some light on this. Particularly anyone who got visa extension with £200k invested but not fully spent?

User avatar
zimba
Moderator
Posts: 21937
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:13 pm
Location: UK
Mood:
United Kingdom

Re: Director's loan: 200k invested or spent?

Post by zimba » Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:00 pm

I got an extension without spending the total sum. You need to show you invested the money and intend to spend it in the business, showing that you are in fact paying the business expenses, bills, fees, employees ..etc. Simply keeping the total sum of money in a bank account will not count as investment as you are not doing any business with it
Advice is given based on my personal research and experience only. Do NOT contact me via private message for immigration advice

n8net
- thin ice -
Posts: 780
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Director's loan: 200k invested or spent?

Post by n8net » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:41 am

I had the same confusion as well.

but clearly, the immigration rules has precedence over guidance, as such as long as you invested the money and operating a genuine business will suffice.

this is consistent with some of the successful applications, there is even one with not much of the original 200k not spent as the expenses were taken out from the revenue of the business.

but, if you have any form of showing that you intend to spent the remainder of the money, I would do that. I hv extension coming up in a week, and majority of my investment happened only in last few months and I am planning to show how I intend to spent the rest.

thanks

yoshinoya
Newly Registered
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Director's loan: 200k invested or spent?

Post by yoshinoya » Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:04 am

Thank you both for clarifying the matter. Please n8net also share your result once you get the extension. Much appreciated!

Locked