Post
by atier2guy » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:04 pm
Thanks Frontier Mole.
I had some further news. The ex-employer seems to be heading towards reducing its number of staff. Subsequently, they are not going to accept the action plan and will surrender the licence (and hence 3 employees will have to find a new employer).
This also worried my friend because she is an ex-employee and left them a bit over a year ago.
She got in contact with the ex-employer now after she heard the news, at least to get a copy of her file before they surrender the licence, and she got to know that they did not keep it!
So what does she do when it's time in the future to apply for ILR?
1- Would payslips, P60 and P45 (which she kept) suffice or does she need anything else from them? Perhaps absence letter at least. But anything else?
2- Apparently one of the reasons resulting in the action plan was record keeping. How can she prove that they 'did' keep records at the time she was there? she had attendance sheets, holiday forms, etc. But this is all probably gone with her file. If the employer failed its duties after she left, would HO assume that he failed his duties while she was employed there and cause her trouble later? She has a few emails here and there regarding business travel, absences, overtime, etc. but the majority of the things were hard copies in her file.
3- What about records of the RLMT that was done prior to her joining them? Can she contact universal job match herself and get a copy of the ad? It's long gone (and does not know the ID of it). At the time of application, I assume HO made copies of this, right? So no need to provide it again? And what if they didn't keep a copy and want to scrutinise all at ILR stage (due to the downgrade of the ex-employer), how can she prove it?
4- One of the existing employees is the one who told her the reason behind the action plan. But he does not know the full details of what records the employer did not keep properly, and whether it is related to existing or previous employees. If it's the latter (or both), then how can that affect her at ILR?
It's sad that the shortcomings of her ex sponsor the past year will put previous years and employees into question.