- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Have you been interviewed about your self employed earnings and did you present supporting documents at the time of interview to show genuineness of self-employed earnings to satisfy caseworker? Just a DNS report and report of active pages will not add much weight, you should provide copy of invoices, contract letters and company information, bank statements, client communication, confirmation of period of employment etc to prove you worked with them at the time.kiranv5 wrote:
Can i provide the webpages when it was active. The dns report when the website was hosted?
Client B have a client and I developed their website and it is still active but Client B don't have their own website.
They are ready to provide me any documents I require but I don't know what documents should i provide to
HO to prove I worked for their websites .
It may arguably be a good practice to provide additional documents as "third" evidence but from legal point of view, if you just provide the required documents as specified in the policy, HO shouldn't refuse you on the basis of lack of evidence. If they require any additional documents, they should ask you instead of refusing you.mianzaidzubair wrote:If you have this then this counts as the third (additional) evidence along with accountants letter and bank statements.
There's a difference between "new" and "additional" evidence. If you provided all the required documents and HO refused you raising a doubt on the genuineness of your business, you "may" still be able to submit further documents as prove to support genuineness of your income.AR will not allow you to do provide additional evidence so the best you can do is provide a detailed explanation. If it doesnt work, make a fresh application with the confirmation letter from client of the work done and payment made.
I do not agree with you on this. The decision is wrong in fact and in law. You don't need to provide any additional documents to prove that your business is genuine. You are only supposed to provide the required documents with an application. If they doubt something they should ask for further documents under evidential flexibility which they clearly didn't. The caseworker has missed a very basic principle that's a part of almost every IT work you do. The developer's responsibility is only to develop the website and certainly not to ensure that it keeps running unless its a part of contract. What the client does with his website is his own business. The OP only claimed income for developing the website not for ensuring that the website would keep working. Even if they don't accept the additional documents, their logic of concluding that the business is not genuine solely on the basic of website being nonfunctional is completely flawed. As OP said, he was only liable to develop the website under his contract with his client. The client may have their own hosting space etc and OP cant be made responsible for what they are doing to their website. OP's responsibility was to deliver a project which he did and reported all earnings to HMRC. you don't really need any additional document to prove that. I would suggest OP to apply for admin review challenging their logic and clearly stating that he was only responsible for development and not for hosting etc.mianzaidzubair wrote:Admin review is only in place to point out any caseworking error that may have resulted in your application being refused. Caseworking error is not considering all the documents or wrong interpretation of the immigration rules. As soon as you provide more documents as part of the Admin Review your review will be refused. You can call it "new", "additional" or whatever documents if you like. I have been through an Admin Review myself so I know this for sure. The rules clearly state that "Don’t send new information or documents for review unless you’ve been asked to."
Your best bet is to reapply with additional documents.
In short, yes they can. Regardless of whether its a fresh application or AR, If there are other grounds of refusal, they could refuse you again.kiranv5 wrote: Now my question is can HO still change their decisions in AR , I mean now 245CD after submitting can they change it to something new ?