- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Unfortunately your time not exercising treaty rights (by not having CSI as a student or whilst selfsufficient) would work against such an application.blahblah wrote:Hi everyone!
I received a refusal letter from the Home Office. I have been living in the UK for over ten years now, and sometimes I was student, and self-sufficient. The problem of course like in many other cases I did not have the sickness insurance as I did not know about it.
Now my question would be the long term residence which is 10 years is applicable in this case or I was here unlawfully during the university and while I was self-sufficient?
Thanks!
Other members have failed on 10-year route due to not exercising treaty rights or not having a Union citizen sponsor who was a qp.blahblah wrote:Thank you very much!
This is ridiculous! No I do not have any of this. And I would have certainly got the sickness insurance but I did not know I needed one. But the long term residence clearly states that lawful residence, which I am a lawful residence as I am an eea national right? how can I not be here legally if I am here legally? This does not make any sense. Here we have the free-movement and the right to settle, which I did and now I have not been here legally at all during my time as a student? WHAT? How is that even possible?
So there is now the Brexit, are we facing deportation of any kind?
Just to be sure and I am a student again so I need to have csi to be here legally? but I am legally here under the act of free movement, right? because the letter stated that I do not need to leave the country. so I am here legally I guess, but I am not here legally? now this is going to be very interesting in couple of million of cases.
Thank you!LilyLalilu wrote:After the first 3 months you only have a right to reside if you are a qualified person exercising your treaty rights. As a student or self-sufficient without CSI you were not exercising your treaty rights and therefore technically had no right to reside.
As the UK isn't enforcing this unless you apply for a RC or EEA PR, it is a bit of a grey area and I suppose you are not really considered unlawful during the periods without CSI but at the same time did not have a right to reside either, so I am not sure where this leaves you.
Do you have any continuous 5-year period of work?
You will not be deported, as I have explained above.blahblah wrote:Thank you!
No I do not have the 5 years. I was self-sufficient for the time being. for not too long of course. another question. how many days can we leave the uk within 5 years? and for some time jobseeker, but this was before 2014 so that amendment cannot be applied to those years. but my problem is that now I am here illegally and I should be deported anytime just because I do not have the csi? Because if I have the right to live here then I am lawfully living here. how on earth can I be here legally and illegally at the same time. so what am I now a tourist? but that is problem I am not a tourist but I have been living here paying taxes, university, paying bills, rent, and so on. it's just bumped me today, that 10 years of my life I spent in the uk illegally? because this was definitely the last thing I wanted to do. I know that most of the people from any eu countries do not have any clue about the csi, so are we facing deportation let's say in 2 years time? after 10 years of living here. this just cannot be right. to be somewhere legally and in the same time not being there legally.
I am not panicking I am simple sad. we have a home where we can go back anytime we want. It was my last intention to be here illegally. we paid our bills, rents, no criminal conviction, etc. now there we are not even recognised as residence. we were kinda led to believe that we are here rightfully, legally, etc. under the free movement act. this is not the way how to act against simple people. you see I am sad and furthermost I do not want my kid growing up in a country which treats people like objects. this is not forwarding. thank you for the tip to have the insurance now I will sort that out. you see I am sad because this country had a long history to be part in slave trades. I guess those times just never ended. now you see I will probably leave the country before brexit will happen. because we are not slaves to put us on a boat and kick us out from a place where we thought we were settled legally. I do not whish to teach this to my kids. I was under the impression that during the ten years of residence we became residence. we learned the language as much as we can, no criminal offence, etc.noajthan wrote:Other members have failed on 10-year route due to not exercising treaty rights or not having a Union citizen sponsor who was a qp.blahblah wrote:Thank you very much!
This is ridiculous! No I do not have any of this. And I would have certainly got the sickness insurance but I did not know I needed one. But the long term residence clearly states that lawful residence, which I am a lawful residence as I am an eea national right? how can I not be here legally if I am here legally? This does not make any sense. Here we have the free-movement and the right to settle, which I did and now I have not been here legally at all during my time as a student? WHAT? How is that even possible?
So there is now the Brexit, are we facing deportation of any kind?
Just to be sure and I am a student again so I need to have csi to be here legally? but I am legally here under the act of free movement, right? because the letter stated that I do not need to leave the country. so I am here legally I guess, but I am not here legally? now this is going to be very interesting in couple of million of cases.
And if you were a qp you would have acquired PR in 5 years so no need to go down 10 year route unless you previously had some UK domestic visas.
The requirements for acquiring PR status are well known, as defined in Directive 2004/38/EC and corresponding transposition into UK law (EEA Regulations).
You have to be a qualified person. Mere presence in the country, doing something, is not enough.
You can dig into these vital matters in guidance here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... _clean.pdf
You don't need to panic. You don't face deportation and noone is going to come smashing down your doors.
HO has admin removal at its disposal but you just need to exercise treaty rights and that cannot apply.
You can regularise your position in UK by simply exercising treaty rights from now onwards.
What are you doing now?
In fact to be sure you haven't accidentally acquired PR already, what is your outline timeline of all activities in UK?
With all this wild talk of Brexit it would be prudent to have some EU documentation whilst you work towards acquiring PR status.
Suggest you at least apply for a RC - form EEA (QP).
LilyLalilu wrote:As above, calm down, no one is going to deport you. Unfortunately, a lot of people did not know about the CSI requirement and I understand that it must be really frustrating. But as you can't do anything about it retrospectively, your best bet is to 'regularise' your stay now by being a student with CSI (i.e. a qualified person exercising their treaty rights) and apply for EEA QP if you fancy.
Another good defence against the deportation you fear is to get yourself up to speed with all the relevant EU and UK legislation regarding free movement now - knowledge is power.
This is not a vendetta nor some sort of imperialism in action - it is EU law in practice.blahblah wrote:I am not panicking I am simple sad. we have a home where we can go back anytime we want. It was my last intention to be here illegally. we paid our bills, rents, no criminal conviction, etc. now there we are not even recognised as residence. we were kinda led to believe that we are here rightfully, legally, etc. under the free movement act. this is not the way how to act against simple people. you see I am sad and furthermost I do not want my kid growing up in a country which treats people like objects. this is not forwarding. thank you for the tip to have the insurance now I will sort that out. you see I am sad because this country had a long history to be part in slave trades. I guess those times just never ended. now you see I will probably leave the country before brexit will happen. because we are not slaves to put us on a boat and kick us out from a place where we thought we were settled legally. I do not whish to teach this to my kids. I was under the impression that during the ten years of residence we became residence. we learned the language as much as we can, no criminal offence, etc.
my class mate told me that this is 1942 again. I believe it is slave trading again.
I do believe that most of the eu citizens are not aware this csi requirements.
Thanks for the answers everybody!
What is the significance of 1942 to this discussion?blahblah wrote:my class mate told me that this is 1942 again.
Nothing obvious to be found here In a year dominated by WW2, events elsewhere in Europe maybe?secret.simon wrote:What is the significance of 1942 to this discussion?blahblah wrote:my class mate told me that this is 1942 again.
noajthan wrote:This is not a vendetta nor some sort of imperialism in action - it is EU law in practice.blahblah wrote:I am not panicking I am simple sad. we have a home where we can go back anytime we want. It was my last intention to be here illegally. we paid our bills, rents, no criminal conviction, etc. now there we are not even recognised as residence. we were kinda led to believe that we are here rightfully, legally, etc. under the free movement act. this is not the way how to act against simple people. you see I am sad and furthermost I do not want my kid growing up in a country which treats people like objects. this is not forwarding. thank you for the tip to have the insurance now I will sort that out. you see I am sad because this country had a long history to be part in slave trades. I guess those times just never ended. now you see I will probably leave the country before brexit will happen. because we are not slaves to put us on a boat and kick us out from a place where we thought we were settled legally. I do not whish to teach this to my kids. I was under the impression that during the ten years of residence we became residence. we learned the language as much as we can, no criminal offence, etc.
my class mate told me that this is 1942 again. I believe it is slave trading again.
I do believe that most of the eu citizens are not aware this csi requirements.
Thanks for the answers everybody!
The need for CSI has been there since birth of Directive 2004/38/EC. UK only starting enforcing it in 2011 - that's how even-handed UK has been
Suggest drop the slave mentality - that can damage you.
As in most aspects of life, it is applicant's responsibility to fulfill their responsibilities whilst enjoying their rights.
Free movement is not some sort of lifetime visa.
Suggest take action to understand and address everything in a calm and measured way.
That is not a UK requirement. That is an EU requirement and is required for students and self-sufficient people in all EU countries, not just the UK.blahblah wrote:oh by the way this insurance only requirement in the uk
well being a resident but not being a resident at all. and being removed because we did not have some insurance. but we were led to believe that we are lawfully living here. we were led to believe that were are residence in every sense and we are part of the society. but guess what? we are not. you see if we broke the law anyway we should be informed in the meantime that we became illegal. so we could buy an insurance. or whatever needed. not too mention they started ask for after 2011. I had been living here for 5 years till 2011. jeez. illegally? then how on earth I was not informed so I guess I need to pack and leave the country or carry on as some bargain chip, second, third class citizen.secret.simon wrote:What is the significance of 1942 to this discussion?blahblah wrote:my class mate told me that this is 1942 again.
oh ok. sorry my mistake. this is right. but I only became a student in 212 and moved here in 2006. I thought I am permanent residence. as they said I need to live in the uk for 5 years. now I lived here for 10 years. I thought I am permanent residence. and they told us that we do not need to apply as we are eu citizens. which was fine till the brexit vote. now it appears that I am not even a legal residence. I wasted 10 years in a sense. this is just sad. and a lot of people did not know this. I was legally here but noooooo I wasn't. I should have been asked to leave or purchase the insurance. this is just not right. if the government recognised me as a resident how am I not a resident.secret.simon wrote:That is not a UK requirement. That is an EU requirement and is required for students and self-sufficient people in all EU countries, not just the UK.blahblah wrote:oh by the way this insurance only requirement in the uk
Ignorantia iuris non excusat - Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
well thank you, I am not frustrated at all. it just takes some time to stop living here and move back where I am a legal residence, in fact a citizen. I was just simply pointing out that this whole thing is not right and you can be sure more people will face this issue in a very close future. I was just trying to find a way where I do not feel like a not even a citizen where I was led that I am one. it is probably nothing to you to think about to close down ten years of your life and start it over again. it is just not simple as that.LilyLalilu wrote:Probably best to focus your attention on doing something about your situation and take the advice people have given you instead of ranting about how annoying and unfair the situation is. All of us EU citizens are essentially in the same situation and we all have to abide by the same regulations. Complaining and venting your frustration on the internet surely doesn't help anyone.
No, and it doesn't matter if you eat an apple a day to keep the doctor away or work out in the gym etc.ijjlian wrote:If you were not a resident, can you claim your taxes back and pay them into your home country?
To me even if it is a rule to have sickness insurance, could there be a way to argue back with the evidence that you have never been a burden to their social system? Or am I just dreaming of a perfect world?
Other point: Arent you covered by your parents' insurance until an age when you are not financially independent? Which EU country are you from?
I believe all EU student are covered with their home coutnry coverage all through the EU.
How can you afford not to have any insurance btw?