- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
That used to be a concession, until the Court of Appeal rejected it.Obie wrote:Your application became invalid upon receipt of the invalidity notice on the 21 February.
You had section 3C until you were notified of the invalidity.
Therefore overstay was from 21 February to 17 March.
EDIT: Apologies, vinny. I did not see your intervention.30. ..It has always been assumed that an application must be one which is validly made in accordance with the rules and the point has not, so far as I am aware, ever been in issue. In my view the assumption is correct.
...it is a cogent reading of the section to construe the reference to an application as one which is a proper application as defined by rules which Parliament has permitted the Secretary of State to formulate.
...
32. In my judgment, if a decision on the application for leave was intended to include a decision that there is no valid application, Parliament would have had to say so in terms. In my view this is not even a possible reading of the section as it stands.
Vinny in Iqbal, the issue was fee payment, which does not apply to this case. This OP paid the correct fees, but due to missing documents, he was refused. I am not sure that this can be assimilated to Iqbal.vinny wrote:That used to be a concession, until the Court of Appeal rejected it.Obie wrote:Your application became invalid upon receipt of the invalidity notice on the 21 February.
You had section 3C until you were notified of the invalidity.
Therefore overstay was from 21 February to 17 March.
Further to this point, can the OP plead either estoppel or legitimate expectations, if the concession was in place in 2008?vinny wrote:That used to be a concession, until the Court of Appeal rejected it.
I think your understanding is correct. I have cancelled my ILR appointment which is supposed to happen next week. However, I am thinking how I could resubmit the application 46 days after my previous visa expired (31 Jan 2008). The application was handled by a representative so i had no idea about what happened during that time. He didn't tell me about the rejection, I only found out recently after received fast track record data from home office. If an application was rejected under invalidation procedure, can it be validated again? What's the procedure of doing that?secret.simon wrote:An invalid application is treated as if it has never been made/does not exist. It certainly does not extend Section 3C leave.
For the purpose of clarity, Section 3C leave extends existing leave, but does not create any new leave if the previous leave had expired. Your leave expired on 31st January 2008. The 28 days of overstay expired on 28th Feb 2008. Your subsequent application was submitted out of time on 17th March. As you had no existing leave, the period that it was being decided does not count towards Section 3C leave either.
So, your period of overstay was from 31st Jan 2008 till 31st March 2008, when your second application was approved.
You should be eligible for ILR(LR) after 31st March 2018.