Can anyone shed some light on the following question, ideally based on personal experience. I cannot find anything conclusive about it on the internet, of for that matter the guidelines.
In the case of an EEA national who applied for and obtained permanent residence in 2005 and has the original 2005 HO letter ‘granting’ PR (as well as what was then called a residence permit, useless and expired in 2010, but no current PR card or DCPR), would the original HO letter count as an official document proving s/he is free of immigration time restrictions at the time of application for naturalisation. All other criteria including demonstrable continuous residence since 2005 (e.g. through employer and/or HMRC letter and/or P60s) being satisfied.
The language in the AN form booklet is unclear.
On the one hand, on p6 ‘Immigration time restrictions’ it is stated “Usually there is a stamp or sticker in your passport, or you have a biometric residence permit, saying that you have indefinite leave to enter or remain or no time limit on your stay. But you may have a letter from the Home Office saying that you are free from immigration conditions.” Which would clearly apply here, since the 2005 HO letter states just that (“you have been granted permanent residence in the UK.”).
On the other hand, when discussing EEA nationals there seems to be a requirement of a PR card to prove PR status before applying for citizenship, and the AN form asks in 2.4 for the PR card number and date. The AN Guide says EEA nationals without “indefinite leave to remain in the UK” must complete sections 2.4-2.6 (though 2.5-2.6 have disappeared from Form_AN_02-17). It should be that in this context, ILR and PR are equivalent and used interchangeably, with ILR used to avoid contradicting the need for a PR card for EEA nationals without a formal recognition of their PR right. But it’s not clear.
Not accepting the HO letter granting PR would put the EEA national at a disadvantage compared to a non-EEA applicant in a similar position, and would obviously cause extra work for the Home Office. This would seem to violate the HO justification for the PR card requirement for EEA naturalisation applicants (see e.g. the HO FOI response in https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ ... ing-595594).
Nonetheless, things are not clear and it would be good to have certainty before committing to the £1236 fee or whatever it will increase to next. The situation is probably unusual enough that a local NCS is unlikely to have a clear view (in fact, they might even resist putting through the application).
Any help or guidance on this question would be tremendously appreciated, ideally by someone who has been in this or a similar position post the November 2015 procedural changes. Also, any confirmed HO email (or physical) address where a reasonably swift reply to the above question might be expected.
Many thanks in advance.
- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222