- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Winning Appeal meant that CW made a mistake not you. Why would you put yes.rajbhanu300 wrote:Dear Members/Gurus,
I am applying for my extension along with dependents. I am confused in dependent application section k,k18 where it says 'have you ever been refused entry clearance, leave to enter or leave to remain in uk?
I got my initial tier 1 after winning an appeal so what shall I say yes or no?
Your responses are highly appreciated.
Thanks
The answer to that question is by no means critical. This will NOT affect the outcome of your application at all. The answer to this question will not change your immigration historyrajbhanu300 wrote:Thanks vinny,Aliraza12,KAKA-MAG for your suggestions. After these contradicting answers I am really confused as to what can be the right ans. Hope anyone on this forum who successfully extended their visa with similar condition can help me to arrive a decision.
Looking to hear from you.
Thanks
General grounds for refusal: alleged deception and innocent mistakes wrote:As a general rule, though, applicants should be encouraged to disclose absolutely everything that have ever happened, including when they are not strictly speaking answering to the question asked. For example, applications for entry clearance contain a question as to whether the applicant was ever refused a visa application. Strictly speaking, this relates to application for entry clearance, not for leave to remain. However, an applicant who has never been refused a visa, but has been refused leave to remain, would be better off disclosing the leave to remain refusal too, to be on the safe side and ensure that s/he cannot, under any circumstances, be accused of deceiving.