secret.simon wrote:That is my interpretation. As the
Freemovement article states,
the Regulations have been amended to require the British citizen to be the "natural father" of the new-born child, as opposed to just "father" in the earlier Regulations. No form of evidence has been made mandatory, but I would presume that a DNA test would be required to prove that the British citizen is the "natural father".
I would suspect that if DNA testing had become routine for all cases where British citizenship was claimed through an unmarried father (U.K. births where the mother was not a British citizen/settled) we would have heard more about it now. Also- probably more cases overseas.
Something must have prompted the change in the Regulations- but I would think it unusual that someone would allow himself to be named father of a child on a birth certificate without a reasonable degree of confidence that he was in fact the natural father.
It's not clear how this is going to work if the claim to citizenship is made later on in the child's life, by which time the father may be deceased, estranged or otherwise unwilling/unable to provide DNA samples.
To protect the child's British citizenship, is there anything more that the parents can do other than obtain a British passport for the child as soon as possible and keep it valid? It would seem excessive to obtain a DNA test immediately just in case it might be asked for later on but some may choose to do this. Would a Confirmation of British Nationality Status letter be recommended to get the decision documented on Home Office records?
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction.