- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
If you are given a false document, you will only be liable for a civil penalty if it is reasonably
Thank you Marknath, by referring to "only liable for a civil penalty", do you mean, from immigration point of view, at time of extension points may be awarded though?marcnath wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2017 3:42 pmIf you are given a false document, you will only be liable for a civil penalty if it is reasonably
apparent that it is false.This means that a person who is untrained in the identification of
false documents, examining it carefully, but briefly, and without the use of technological aids
could reasonably be expected to realise that the document in question is not genuine.
Follow the instructions at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... t_2017.pdf
That is an open question. But since immigration guidance refers to the same checks, you should be able to argue that you have checked that the person is a settled worker to your best ability.mig2015 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2017 4:01 pmThank you Marknath, by referring to "only liable for a civil penalty", do you mean, from immigration point of view, at time of extension points may be awarded though?marcnath wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2017 3:42 pmIf you are given a false document, you will only be liable for a civil penalty if it is reasonably
apparent that it is false.This means that a person who is untrained in the identification of
false documents, examining it carefully, but briefly, and without the use of technological aids
could reasonably be expected to realise that the document in question is not genuine.
Follow the instructions at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... t_2017.pdf
No, there is no requirement that they have to invest equally.mig2015 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:42 pmDear all members
If two members of an entrepreneur team transfer the total 200K funds from their personal accounts to the business account (in form of DL), but not in 1:1 proportion, e.g. one for 90K and the other for 110K, would it make any issues when claiming points for investment evidence at extension stage?
Many thanks
Hello marcnathmarcnath wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:17 amNo, there is no requirement that they have to invest equally.mig2015 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:42 pmDear all members
If two members of an entrepreneur team transfer the total 200K funds from their personal accounts to the business account (in form of DL), but not in 1:1 proportion, e.g. one for 90K and the other for 110K, would it make any issues when claiming points for investment evidence at extension stage?
Many thanks
A team application allows each member to gain from the evidence of the other. So if one invests 200K and the other 0, it is still acceptable.
Why would entrepreneurial team member have joint accounts ? Nothing to do directly with immigration, but generally not a good idea to have joint accounts unless you want to be financially connected (impacts credit ratings and even some legal situations)
Thank you. The only reason, is in case being asked whether access to the funds has been maintained between initial application to the point funds were fully invested (and if they ask to show both directors have had that access to all 200K)marcnath wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 9:59 amWhy would entrepreneurial team member have joint accounts ? Nothing to do directly with immigration, but generally not a good idea to have joint accounts unless you want to be financially connected (impacts credit ratings and even some legal situations)
So, no, there is no requirement to have the money transferred from a joint account