- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Many thanks!ariskar wrote: ↑Wed Jan 10, 2018 5:58 amSimplest path is applying using maiden name and existing documents, then after obtaining BC, change the name with deed poll.
In case you have a UK marriage certificate with the "new" husband's family name, you can do the following:
As she has lived at least 5 years as your spouse she may naturalise as BC using the 5 year route (1 year ILR already complete and included) without having to provide the marriage certificates and complicate the dual naming case.
If she wishes to naturalise as spouse of BC with the new name, then she will need to change the name on her foreign (Aus.) passport before she can apply or you may run into issues.
Good luck!
For reference: Section 6(1), Section 6(2).You must check the available evidence to see whether an applicant meets the residence requirements.
The following can be used as evidence of residence:
You must not normally accept doctors' letters on their own as proof of residence. However, if nothing else is available and the doctors can confirm that they have seen the applicant on a regular basis during the period concerned these may be accepted.
- original passports or travel documents which have been stamped to show arrival in the UK and entry and departure from other countries:
- these should be checked against the list of absences provided on the application form
- Home Office records
- if the applicant does not have passports to cover the qualifying period, other evidence such as employers’ letters or tax and National Insurance letters:
- in such cases you should assess whether there is sufficient evidence to show that that applicant has been resident in the UK during the qualifying period, giving them the benefit of any doubt where claimed absences are within the limits we would normally allow and there are no grounds to doubt the accuracy of the claim
If there are gaps in a person’s evidence of residence and it is clear from the information available that they could not have travelled, you must accept this. Examples of this might include a refugee who has no means of travel or where immigration records confirm continuous residence.
You must only count whole days' absences from the UK. You must not count the dates of departure and arrival as absences. For example, a person who left the UK on 22 September and returned on 23 September will not be classed as having been absent from the UK.
An applicant only needs to have been physically present in the UK for the purpose of the act. They do not have to have been ordinarily resident or domiciled here.