- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
I think you can argue t as far as job continuity is concerned, but when it comes to hours WORKED, there it gets problematic as no hours are WORKED. What do you think ? Keeping in mind that SMP is written as separate category on wage slipmarcnath wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2018 6:49 pmIt is not very clear but I suspect you would be able to argue it as a valid employment for the purpose of Job Creation attribute.
Job creation is about jobs, not employees. You have created the job and the job is continuing during the maternity period.
There is no specific condition on the salary that should be paid to be a valid job. The only requirement is that you should be following the law. And SMP does not have to meet minimum wage, so that is not an issue.
Hours worked would be the same as what it was before the leave started.10020132 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:56 pmI think you can argue t as far as job continuity is concerned, but when it comes to hours WORKED, there it gets problematic as no hours are WORKED. What do you think ? Keeping in mind that SMP is written as separate category on wage slipmarcnath wrote: ↑Wed Feb 14, 2018 6:49 pmIt is not very clear but I suspect you would be able to argue it as a valid employment for the purpose of Job Creation attribute.
Job creation is about jobs, not employees. You have created the job and the job is continuing during the maternity period.
There is no specific condition on the salary that should be paid to be a valid job. The only requirement is that you should be following the law. And SMP does not have to meet minimum wage, so that is not an issue.