- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
However, the information on their website was also misleading and contradictory.
The words "From 6 April 2018 the Tier 1 (General) category will be closed to all settlement applications" is quite clear that you cannot apply from 6 April 2018. But the words "by this date" implied that applying on 6th April 2018 was possible. They should have used the words "before this date".Tier 1 (General) visa wrote:From 6 April 2018 the Tier 1 (General) category will be closed to all settlement applications. You must apply by post or book and attend a premium service centre appointment by this date.
This may be the important bit.
This a good news for you. This means they accepted the UKVI mistake and now considering your postal application. They have also sent you a bimoetric letter which you will be receiving anytime to attend.namshi5 wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:51 pmThis is an update to my application - can the moderator please read through this and advise what this letter means please? The underlying message looks very convoluted and I cant figure out if this is good or bad news.
1 May 2018
Thank you for your email correspondence of 23 April where you have raised a complaint regarding your application.
You have said that you submitted an online application for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) on 14 March and found out that the earliest appointment available was 6 April.
You explain that you contacted our Customer Contact Centre (CCC) on 5 April in order to confirm that your application would be accepted at our Premium Service Centre (PSC). You state that this is because ILR applications for Tier 1 holders were closed on 6 April. Consequently, you were informed by an agent that your application would be processed on this date.
On 6 April you attended the PSC, however, you were informed by members of staff that you application cannot be accepted as the closing date is 6 April.
Therefore, you explain that you intend to submit a postal application on 6 April and have asked us to apply discretion when considering your case.
I am partially upholding your complaint.
I have contacted our casework team who have confirmed that due to an administrative error you were unable to attend you pre-booked application at the PSC on 6 April. It may help if I explain, that the agent that you spoke to believed that you were able to attend the application interview on 6 April when in fact the end date was the 6 April.
Therefore, on this occasion I would like to apologise for the fact that you booked an appointment and submitted the sum of £2,887 for an immigration interview you were not allowed to attend.
I can confirm that a refund to the sum of 2,787 has been debited back to the bank account you used when submitting your original application. Please note £100.00 has been retained for the application fee as per our policy guidance.
In addition, I can confirm that you currently have a new outstanding ILR application. A BRP enrolment letter has also been despatched to your address on 25 April.
Please accept my sincere apologies for the distress and inconvenience this matter has caused you.
I believe I have addressed all the points you have raised. However if you feel that there are specific aspects that have not been addressed you can request a review of our response within one month of the date on this letter by writing to us at: complaintsreview@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk.
Please ensure that you provide us with specific details setting out why you believe a review is required. This will enable us to provide you with a full response.
Or you can write to us at:
UKVI Complaints Allocation Hub
Lunar House
40 Wellesley Road
Croydon CR9 2BY
Yours sincerely
Customer Service Operations
www.gov.uk/ukvi
I will disagree with you on this. The call centre might have a reputation for giving wrong advice but in this case they gave the right advice. It was the case worker that was wrong for not allowing the application since it is valid on the said date.krisbol17 wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:56 amAs far as I'm concerned the call centre is UKVI since that's the number UKVI has on their website for contacting them so if they give people false information, make sure you use it for your case, they can't just be misleading people like that, it's very bad customer service especially with these hefty fees!!!