They've been very generous and offered me salary instead of leave for the additional leave I can't carryover to next year.
Being a tier 2 employee though makes me slightly cautious about it. I'm not sure if this is classified as a temporary salary increase or an 'allowance'. I did see that in the guidance @ https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... 0_v1.0.pdf
they have actually added in a new bullet point clarifying that they no longer care about reporting of salary increases:
Does this mean it should be no problem at all to get this leave paid as salary? I (mis?)remembered previously that increases in salary had to be reported, but it seems this is no longer the case? I suppose this also extends to a one off increase in salary not needing to be reported anymore, unless that increase is also associated with a promotion?C1.12, 5th bullet point: clarification that sponsors no longer need to report any increases to the worker’s salary [pg.6]
Secondly, if I use a large portion of my leave to spend time overseas for a significant period of time in one go, say 45 days (roughly 30 business days), with potentially maybe 5 of those days as unpaid leave or working remotely, is that too long a time period for a single period of time - is there any tucked away rule about a significant period of absence in one go? I'm aware its comfortably within the 180 days rule. I think the only thing is that I can't take more than 30 days unpaid leave and that if I do take unpaid leave that my employer must report it in the system?
Thank you.