Hi all,
I am applying for British Citizenship by naturalisation and there is two questions that made me very confused!
In brief, i have spent more than 90 days outside the uk in the last year preceding
my application ( 106) days more precisely, so exceeded by 16 days in total.
While abroad, i had an accident causing an injury on my foot so i could not travel back on time to the UK and i have evidence that i will add on my application.
THE FIRST QUESTION IS REGARDING THE RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT AND SAYS:
You must have been in the UK on the first day of your 3-year or 5-year qualifying period
You must not have spent more than 270 days outside the UK during a 3-year qualifying period, or 450 days during a 5-year qualifying period
You must not have been outside the UK for more than 90 days in the last 12 months
You must not have been here illegally in the 3-year or 5-year qualifying period
I have answered NO and explained the reason why i spent more than 90 days abroad in the last year.
THE SECOND QUESTION IS ABOUT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES, IT SAYS:
1: Are there any reasons why you cannot meet the requirements to become a British citizen (for example, you have had too many absences from the UK)?
Yes or No?
2: If you do not meet the statutory requirements to become a British citizen, are there any special circumstances why you think the Home Secretary should still grant your application?
Here, i am very confused!!! SHOULD I ANSWER YES OR NO ?!
As mentioned above, i've already answered why i spent more than 90 days in the Previous question
What do they mean by: (Are there any reasons why you cannot meet the requirements to become a British citizen)?
Do i have to answer the same thing again with explanation OR can i just ANSWER NO to these two questions!!!
Thank you in advance
- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222